HDV vs. IEMG
HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDV returned 9.50%/yr vs 8.78%/yr for IEMG. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. HDV charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
HDV vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 15.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 9.50%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
HDV
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 13.60%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 24.04%
- 3Y*
- 15.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.85%
IEMG
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- 6M
- 7.28%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 1Y
- 28.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $163.75M | $142.23M | $95.79M | |
| $959.90M | $1.12B | $1.07B |
HDV vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 20.12% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 15.55% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDV and IEMG is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012 | 0.50 |
The correlation between HDV and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDV vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDV
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
HDV
IEMG
Healthcare
HDV
IEMG
Energy
HDV
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
HDV
IEMG
Utilities
HDV
IEMG
Communication Services
HDV
IEMG
Financial Services
HDV
IEMG
Industrials
HDV
IEMG
Technology
HDV
IEMG
Basic Materials
HDV
IEMG
Real Estate
HDV
-
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDV vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
HDV
IEMG
HDV vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDV | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.24 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 2.13 | +2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.72 | 6.72 | +6.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDV vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, roughly equal to the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDV | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.04% | -38.71% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -13.21% | +8.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.49% | -17.21% | +6.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.42% | -33.61% | +18.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.04% | -38.71% | +1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.41% | +10.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.07% | -12.90% | +9.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 4.19% | -2.30% |
Volatility
HDV vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 4.88%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDV | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 7.86% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.55% | 21.27% | -12.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 23.23% | -12.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.93% | 19.21% | -6.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.77% | 20.26% | -4.49% |
HDV vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HDV vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than IEMG's 2.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 3.07% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.33% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDV and IEMG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to HDV (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.50% vs 8.78% for IEMG. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.50% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.
HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.33% for IEMG.
HDV is categorized as Dividend, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.09% for IEMG.
HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDV and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer