PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDV vs. IEMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDV vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDV achieves a 20.12% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 15.55% return. Over the past 10 years, HDV has outperformed IEMG with an annualized return of 9.50%, while IEMG has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.


HDV

1D
1.23%
1M
4.76%
6M
13.60%
YTD
20.12%
1Y
24.04%
3Y*
15.34%
5Y*
12.15%
10Y*
9.50%
ALL TIME*
10.85%

IEMG

1D
-1.78%
1M
-6.23%
6M
7.28%
YTD
15.55%
1Y
28.48%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
8.78%
ALL TIME*
6.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$163.75M$142.23M$95.79M
$959.90M$1.12B$1.07B

HDV vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
20.12%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
15.55%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%

Correlation

The correlation between HDV and IEMG is -0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.50

The correlation between HDV and IEMG shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDV vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDV
IEMG

Consumer Defensive

24.3%
2.8%

Healthcare

23.9%
3.2%

Energy

19.8%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
7.7%

Utilities

8.2%
1.9%

Communication Services

5.2%
5.6%

Financial Services

4.7%
17.3%

Industrials

2.8%
7.7%

Technology

0.9%
43.6%

Basic Materials

0.8%
5.8%

Real Estate

-

1.5%

Consumer Defensive

HDV
24.3%
IEMG
2.8%

Healthcare

HDV
23.9%
IEMG
3.2%

Energy

HDV
19.8%
IEMG
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HDV
9.3%
IEMG
7.7%

Utilities

HDV
8.2%
IEMG
1.9%

Communication Services

HDV
5.2%
IEMG
5.6%

Financial Services

HDV
4.7%
IEMG
17.3%

Industrials

HDV
2.8%
IEMG
7.7%

Technology

HDV
0.9%
IEMG
43.6%

Basic Materials

HDV
0.8%
IEMG
5.8%

Real Estate

HDV

-

IEMG
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDV vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDV vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDVIEMGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.24

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

2.13

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

6.72

+6.00

HDV vs. IEMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the IEMG Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDV and IEMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDV vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDV drawdown since its inception was -37.04%, roughly equal to the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDV and IEMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDVIEMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.04%

-38.71%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-13.21%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.49%

-17.21%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.42%

-33.61%

+18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.04%

-38.71%

+1.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.41%

+10.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.07%

-12.90%

+9.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

4.19%

-2.30%

Volatility

HDV vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) is 4.88%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 7.86%. This indicates that HDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDVIEMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

7.86%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.55%

21.27%

-12.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.74%

23.23%

-12.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.93%

19.21%

-6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

20.26%

-4.49%

HDV vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDV vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison

HDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than IEMG's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
3.07%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.33%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDV and IEMG have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to HDV (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDV dropped -37.04% vs IEMG's -38.71%.

On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.50% vs 8.78% for IEMG. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, HDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.50% return vs 8.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.

HDV has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.33% for IEMG.

HDV is categorized as Dividend, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Equities. HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.08% for HDV and 0.09% for IEMG.

HDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDV and IEMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer