PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDMV vs. DFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDMV vs. DFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than DFAX's 15.23% return.


HDMV

1D
-0.67%
1M
-1.37%
YTD
4.23%
6M
5.97%
1Y
9.53%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
6.31%
10Y*

DFAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.89%
YTD
15.23%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDMV vs. DFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.23%29.31%2.99%9.62%-11.47%-1.26%
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
15.23%35.42%4.78%16.66%-14.48%-2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between HDMV and DFAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.83

The correlation between HDMV and DFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

HDMV vs. DFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDMV
DFAX

Financial Services

24.4%
17.9%

Industrials

15.2%
16.1%

Utilities

14.6%
4.2%

Real Estate

13.8%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

13.0%
3.9%

Communication Services

9.4%
3.5%

Healthcare

3.1%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
10.9%

Energy

1.8%
6.6%

Basic Materials

1.0%
13.2%

Technology

0.9%
10.9%

Financial Services

HDMV
24.4%
DFAX
17.9%

Industrials

HDMV
15.2%
DFAX
16.1%

Utilities

HDMV
14.6%
DFAX
4.2%

Real Estate

HDMV
13.8%
DFAX
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

HDMV
13.0%
DFAX
3.9%

Communication Services

HDMV
9.4%
DFAX
3.5%

Healthcare

HDMV
3.1%
DFAX
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

HDMV
2.7%
DFAX
10.9%

Energy

HDMV
1.8%
DFAX
6.6%

Basic Materials

HDMV
1.0%
DFAX
13.2%

Technology

HDMV
0.9%
DFAX
10.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDMV vs. DFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDMV
HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDMV vs. DFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDMVDFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.43

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.16

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

12.50

-9.08

HDMV vs. DFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDMV Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the DFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDMV and DFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDMVDFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

2.37

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.65

-0.24

Drawdowns

HDMV vs. DFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than DFAX's maximum drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and DFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDMVDFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.01%

-28.15%

-3.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-11.11%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.33%

-13.89%

+3.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.05%

-1.00%

-5.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-6.67%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.80%

2.80%

0.00%

Volatility

HDMV vs. DFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) is 3.83%, while Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that HDMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDMVDFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

5.27%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

12.67%

-3.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

14.83%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.05%

15.99%

-3.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.24%

15.99%

-2.75%

HDMV vs. DFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDMV vs. DFAX - Dividend Comparison

HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than DFAX's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.22%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.70%5.09%3.24%3.14%3.53%3.11%1.45%3.63%2.88%3.23%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDMV and DFAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to HDMV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs DFAX's -28.15%.

On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 20.90% vs 12.63% for HDMV. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.

HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 2.22% for DFAX.

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.30% for DFAX.

DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDMV and DFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer