HDMV vs. DFAX
HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) and DFAX (Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. HDMV is actively managed, while DFAX is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDMV returned 12.63%/yr vs 20.90%/yr for DFAX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HDMV charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for DFAX.
Performance
HDMV vs. DFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDMV achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than DFAX's 15.23% return.
HDMV
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- 9.53%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAX
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 34.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.90%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HDMV vs. DFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.23% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | -1.26% |
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 15.23% | 35.42% | 4.78% | 16.66% | -14.48% | -2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDMV and DFAX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.83 |
The correlation between HDMV and DFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
HDMV vs. DFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDMV
DFAX
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
HDMV
DFAX
Industrials
HDMV
DFAX
Utilities
HDMV
DFAX
Real Estate
HDMV
DFAX
Consumer Defensive
HDMV
DFAX
Communication Services
HDMV
DFAX
Healthcare
HDMV
DFAX
Consumer Cyclical
HDMV
DFAX
Energy
HDMV
DFAX
Basic Materials
HDMV
DFAX
Technology
HDMV
DFAX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDMV vs. DFAX — Risk / Return Rank
HDMV
DFAX
HDMV vs. DFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDMV | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.43 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 3.16 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | 12.50 | -9.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDMV | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 2.37 | -1.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
HDMV vs. DFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDMV drawdown since its inception was -32.01%, which is greater than DFAX's maximum drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDMV and DFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDMV | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.01% | -28.15% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -11.11% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.33% | -13.89% | +3.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.05% | -1.00% | -5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -6.67% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.80% | 2.80% | 0.00% |
Volatility
HDMV vs. DFAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) is 3.83%, while Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that HDMV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDMV | DFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 5.27% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | 12.67% | -3.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.16% | 14.83% | -3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.05% | 15.99% | -3.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.24% | 15.99% | -2.75% |
HDMV vs. DFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDMV has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAX's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDMV vs. DFAX - Dividend Comparison
HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than DFAX's 2.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.22% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 3.01% | 3.30% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.70% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDMV and DFAX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to HDMV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDMV dropped -32.01% vs DFAX's -28.15%.
On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 20.90% vs 12.63% for HDMV. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, HDMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 12.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for HDMV.
HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 2.22% for DFAX.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for HDMV and 0.30% for DFAX.
DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDMV and DFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer