HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

HDIF.TO (Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units) and HUTL.TO (Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDIF.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Harvest, while HUTL.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HDIF.TO returned 16.16%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for HUTL.TO. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HDIF.TO charges 2.47%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for HUTL.TO.

Performance

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HDIF.TO having a 11.41% return and HUTL.TO slightly lower at 11.39%.

HDIF.TO

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 0.41%
• 6M: 10.06%
• YTD: 11.41%
• 1Y: 20.97%
• 3Y*: 16.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.05%

HUTL.TO

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.77%
• 6M: 8.67%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 1Y: 13.44%
• 3Y*: 13.72%
• 5Y*: 8.60%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 7.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units	CA$936.04K	CA$826.90K	CA$827.56K
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	CA$927.76K	CA$1.27M	CA$1.21M

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units	11.41%	15.70%	18.44%	12.76%	-14.72%
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	11.39%	15.59%	14.70%	3.11%	-5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between HDIF.TO and HUTL.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2022	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between HDIF.TO and HUTL.TO has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HDIF.TO	HUTL.TO
Technology	30.1%	-
Financial Services	15.6%	-
Healthcare	12.1%	-
Industrials	9.8%	3.6%
Communication Services	9.5%	36.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	-
Utilities	4.6%	42.7%
Energy	4.4%	16.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Real Estate	0.7%	-

Return for Risk

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDIF.TO

HDIF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 71
HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
HDIF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HDIF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 68
HDIF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
HDIF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

HUTL.TO

HUTL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 60
HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HUTL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
HUTL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
HUTL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
HUTL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) and Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HDIF.TO	HUTL.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	1.26	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	1.87	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.23	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.97	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.72	7.62	+2.10

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the HUTL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDIF.TO and HUTL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.08%, smaller than the maximum HUTL.TO drawdown of -34.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDIF.TO and HUTL.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	HDIF.TO	HUTL.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.08%	-34.00%	+9.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.79%	-4.54%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.59%	-9.44%	-10.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.09%	-2.06%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.48%	-6.57%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	1.77%	+0.39%

Volatility

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) is 3.04%, while Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF (HUTL.TO) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that HDIF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUTL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HDIF.TO	HUTL.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.04%	4.35%	-1.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	9.27%	+0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.17%	10.75%	+2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	13.04%	+4.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.34%	15.21%	+2.13%

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDIF.TO has a 2.47% expense ratio, which is higher than HUTL.TO's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

HDIF.TO vs. HUTL.TO - Dividend Comparison

HDIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, more than HUTL.TO's 7.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
HDIF.TO Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units	10.50%	9.95%	10.14%	10.59%	8.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HUTL.TO Harvest Equal Weight Global Utilities Income ETF	7.67%	7.94%	8.30%	8.56%	8.13%	7.16%	7.73%	6.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HDIF.TO and HUTL.TO in my portfolio?

HDIF.TO and HUTL.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HDIF.TO or HUTL.TO?

On fees, HUTL.TO is cheaper at 0.67% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HDIF.TO or HUTL.TO?

HUTL.TO is cheaper with a 0.67% expense ratio, compared with 2.47% for HDIF.TO.

What is the main difference between HDIF.TO and HUTL.TO?

HDIF.TO is categorized as Derivative Income, while HUTL.TO is Utilities Equities. Their fees differ too: 2.47% for HDIF.TO and 0.67% for HUTL.TO.