PortfoliosLab logo
HDIF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HDIF.TO and ZMMK.TO is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HDIF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HDIF.TO:

0.60

ZMMK.TO:

12.63

Sortino Ratio

HDIF.TO:

0.94

ZMMK.TO:

39.12

Omega Ratio

HDIF.TO:

1.14

ZMMK.TO:

13.22

Calmar Ratio

HDIF.TO:

0.54

ZMMK.TO:

66.62

Martin Ratio

HDIF.TO:

1.94

ZMMK.TO:

455.84

Ulcer Index

HDIF.TO:

5.48%

ZMMK.TO:

0.01%

Daily Std Dev

HDIF.TO:

18.19%

ZMMK.TO:

0.31%

Max Drawdown

HDIF.TO:

-24.08%

ZMMK.TO:

-0.16%

Current Drawdown

HDIF.TO:

-7.74%

ZMMK.TO:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDIF.TO achieves a -1.55% return, which is significantly lower than ZMMK.TO's 1.21% return.


HDIF.TO

YTD

-1.55%

1M

3.03%

6M

-7.74%

1Y

10.91%

3Y*

6.25%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

ZMMK.TO

YTD

1.21%

1M

0.26%

6M

1.64%

1Y

3.96%

3Y*

4.27%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HDIF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDIF.TO has a 2.47% expense ratio, which is higher than ZMMK.TO's 0.13% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HDIF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDIF.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HDIF.TO is 5555
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HDIF.TO is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HDIF.TO is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HDIF.TO is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HDIF.TO is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HDIF.TO is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

ZMMK.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZMMK.TO is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZMMK.TO is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZMMK.TO is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZMMK.TO is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZMMK.TO is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZMMK.TO is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HDIF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) and BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HDIF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the ZMMK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 12.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDIF.TO and ZMMK.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HDIF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Dividend Comparison

HDIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.82%, more than ZMMK.TO's 3.97% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
HDIF.TO
Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units
10.82%10.15%10.62%8.95%0.00%
ZMMK.TO
BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series
3.97%4.66%4.98%1.95%0.04%

Drawdowns

HDIF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.08%, which is greater than ZMMK.TO's maximum drawdown of -0.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDIF.TO and ZMMK.TO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HDIF.TO vs. ZMMK.TO - Volatility Comparison

Harvest Diversified Monthly Income ETF - Class A Units (HDIF.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to BMO Money Market Fund ETF Series (ZMMK.TO) at 0.07%. This indicates that HDIF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMMK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...