HDGE vs. YOLO
HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HDGE is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while YOLO is a Cannabis fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, HDGE returned -2.89%/yr vs -31.60%/yr for YOLO. At a correlation of -0.48, they often move in opposite directions. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for YOLO.
Performance
HDGE vs. YOLO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly higher than YOLO's -11.82% return.
HDGE
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -14.77%
YOLO
- 1D
- -5.83%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- YTD
- -11.82%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 48.47%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- -31.60%
- 10Y*
- —
HDGE vs. YOLO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 5.43% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -17.73% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | -11.82% | 36.36% | -17.81% | -15.10% | -72.21% | -20.48% | 47.17% | -50.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDGE and YOLO is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019 | -0.48 |
The correlation between HDGE and YOLO shifts across timeframes, from -0.48 (all time) to -0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDGE vs. YOLO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDGE
YOLO
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
-
Utilities
HDGE
-
YOLO
-
Basic Materials
HDGE
YOLO
-
Energy
HDGE
YOLO
-
Communication Services
HDGE
YOLO
-
Healthcare
HDGE
YOLO
Consumer Defensive
HDGE
YOLO
Real Estate
HDGE
YOLO
Industrials
HDGE
YOLO
-
Consumer Cyclical
HDGE
YOLO
Financial Services
HDGE
YOLO
Technology
HDGE
YOLO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDGE vs. YOLO — Risk / Return Rank
HDGE
YOLO
HDGE vs. YOLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDGE | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.19 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | 1.19 | -1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | 2.23 | -2.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDGE | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 0.65 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.59 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.48 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
HDGE vs. YOLO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, roughly equal to the maximum YOLO drawdown of -94.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and YOLO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDGE | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -94.68% | +0.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -41.09% | +28.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -66.45% | +36.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.97% | -92.47% | +49.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.08% | -89.68% | -3.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -68.94% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | 21.83% | -15.67% |
Volatility
HDGE vs. YOLO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) is 6.41%, while AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that HDGE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YOLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDGE | YOLO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 12.79% | -6.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 52.52% | -39.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 74.56% | -56.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 53.64% | -29.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 51.36% | -27.80% |
HDGE vs. YOLO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than YOLO's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDGE vs. YOLO - Dividend Comparison
HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, while YOLO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.57% | 1.17% | 0.55% | 3.93% | 2.03% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDGE and YOLO have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YOLO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to HDGE (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs YOLO's -94.68%.
On 5-year performance, HDGE leads with -2.89% vs -31.60% for YOLO. On fees, YOLO is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, HDGE has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, HDGE has performed better with a -2.89% return vs -31.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
YOLO is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for YOLO.
HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while YOLO is Cannabis. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.75% for YOLO.
YOLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDGE and YOLO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer