HDGE vs. SH
HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) and SH (ProShares Short S&P500) are both Inverse Equities funds. HDGE is actively managed, while SH is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDGE returned -14.77%/yr vs -12.89%/yr for SH. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDGE charges 3.36%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for SH.
Performance
HDGE vs. SH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDGE achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly higher than SH's -8.00% return. Over the past 10 years, HDGE has underperformed SH with an annualized return of -14.77%, while SH has yielded a comparatively higher -12.89% annualized return.
HDGE
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -14.77%
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
HDGE vs. SH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 5.43% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -36.27% | 7.53% | -15.24% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDGE and SH is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between HDGE and SH shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDGE vs. SH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDGE
SH
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Utilities
HDGE
-
SH
-
Basic Materials
HDGE
SH
-
Energy
HDGE
SH
-
Communication Services
HDGE
SH
-
Healthcare
HDGE
SH
-
Consumer Defensive
HDGE
SH
-
Real Estate
HDGE
SH
-
Industrials
HDGE
SH
-
Consumer Cyclical
HDGE
SH
-
Financial Services
HDGE
SH
Technology
HDGE
SH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDGE vs. SH — Risk / Return Rank
HDGE
SH
HDGE vs. SH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and ProShares Short S&P500 (SH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDGE | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.77 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.05 | -0.95 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.11 | -1.75 | +1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDGE | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | -1.47 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.54 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.63 | -0.72 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.59 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
HDGE vs. SH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDGE drawdown since its inception was -93.88%, roughly equal to the maximum SH drawdown of -94.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDGE and SH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDGE | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.88% | -94.66% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.26% | -18.28% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | -38.82% | +9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.97% | -44.53% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.69% | -76.12% | -7.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.08% | -94.62% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -67.73% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.16% | 9.89% | -3.73% |
Volatility
HDGE vs. SH - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) at 2.84%. This indicates that HDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDGE | SH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 2.84% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.81% | 8.91% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 11.80% | +6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.18% | 16.85% | +7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 18.01% | +5.55% |
HDGE vs. SH - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than SH's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
HDGE vs. SH - Dividend Comparison
HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%, less than SH's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDGE and SH have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDGE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDGE dropped -93.88% vs SH's -94.66%.
On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.89% vs -14.77% for HDGE. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.89% return vs -14.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 3.32% for HDGE.
They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 0.90% for SH.
HDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDGE and SH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer