PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDGE vs. EATZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDGE vs. EATZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HDGE

1D
-2.03%
1M
-7.18%
6M
-9.45%
YTD
-7.47%
1Y
-11.50%
3Y*
-4.40%
5Y*
-5.88%
10Y*
-15.33%
ALL TIME*
-15.58%

EATZ

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.39M$1.04M$1.07M

HDGE vs. EATZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
-7.47%1.50%-8.01%-26.98%16.59%-0.76%
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
4.80%-6.67%23.21%25.23%-20.68%-4.90%

Correlation

The correlation between HDGE and EATZ is -0.47, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

-0.66

The correlation between HDGE and EATZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.66 (5 years) to -0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDGE vs. EATZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDGE
EATZ

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

-1.5%

-

Basic Materials

-2.5%

-

Energy

-2.5%

-

Communication Services

-4.9%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

-6.9%
16.9%

Industrials

-10.0%
4.9%

Real Estate

-10.4%

-

Financial Services

-13.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-22.3%
78.2%

Technology

-31.0%

-

Utilities

HDGE

-

EATZ

-

Healthcare

HDGE
-1.5%
EATZ

-

Basic Materials

HDGE
-2.5%
EATZ

-

Energy

HDGE
-2.5%
EATZ

-

Communication Services

HDGE
-4.9%
EATZ
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

HDGE
-6.9%
EATZ
16.9%

Industrials

HDGE
-10.0%
EATZ
4.9%

Real Estate

HDGE
-10.4%
EATZ

-

Financial Services

HDGE
-13.8%
EATZ

-

Consumer Cyclical

HDGE
-22.3%
EATZ
78.2%

Technology

HDGE
-31.0%
EATZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDGE vs. EATZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

EATZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HDGE vs. EATZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) and AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDGEEATZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.56

HDGE vs. EATZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDGE vs. EATZ - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDGEEATZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-82.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.55%

Volatility

HDGE vs. EATZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDGEEATZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

HDGE vs. EATZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDGE has a 3.36% expense ratio, which is higher than EATZ's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDGE vs. EATZ - Dividend Comparison

HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than EATZ's 0.48% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
0.48%0.50%0.18%0.49%2.35%0.15%0.00%0.00%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.78%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDGE and EATZ have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EATZ is cheaper at 1.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EATZ is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.78%, compared with 0.48% for EATZ.

HDGE is categorized as Inverse Equities, while EATZ is Consumer Discretionary Equities. Their fees differ too: 3.36% for HDGE and 1.00% for EATZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDGE and EATZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer