HDG vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
HDG and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HDG is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Merrill Lynch Factor Model - Exchange Series. It was launched on Jul 12, 2011. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both HDG and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
HDG vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HDG vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDG ProShares Hedge Replication | 0.49% | 7.18% | 5.12% | 7.14% | -8.48% | 2.97% | 7.45% | 9.58% | -4.52% | 5.59% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -13.35% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDG achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, HDG has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 3.41%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 29.40% annualized return.
HDG
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- 0.49%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- 8.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.75%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.41%
QLD
- 1D
- 6.72%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HDG vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both HDG and QLD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Return for Risk
HDG vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
HDG
QLD
HDG vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HDG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 0.84 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 1.43 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.49 | +0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.95 | 4.88 | +2.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HDG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 0.84 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.34 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.66 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.53 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between HDG and QLD is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HDG vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
HDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDG ProShares Hedge Replication | 2.49% | 2.55% | 3.50% | 3.48% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 1.09% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
HDG vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDG drawdown since its inception was -15.31%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDG and QLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.31% | -83.13% | +67.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.85% | -25.13% | +20.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.31% | -63.68% | +48.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.31% | -63.68% | +48.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.74% | -20.10% | +17.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -18.30% | +15.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.19% | 7.67% | -6.48% |
Volatility
HDG vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Hedge Replication (HDG) is 2.61%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that HDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HDG | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.61% | 12.96% | -10.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.43% | 25.55% | -21.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.90% | 44.91% | -38.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.15% | 44.77% | -37.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.08% | 44.47% | -37.39% |