HDEF vs. FNDF
HDEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - HDEF tracks the MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index while FNDF tracks the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HDEF returned 9.42%/yr vs 12.34%/yr for FNDF. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HDEF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.
Performance
HDEF vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HDEF achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, HDEF has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 9.42%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.
HDEF
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 6.62%
- 6M
- 8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
FNDF
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 19.66%
- 6M
- 21.60%
- 1Y
- 41.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.69%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
HDEF vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 6.62% | 33.01% | 2.85% | 18.53% | -2.51% | 6.95% | -1.90% | 25.02% | -13.74% | 9.89% |
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 19.66% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between HDEF and FNDF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015 | 0.78 |
The correlation between HDEF and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
HDEF vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HDEF
FNDF
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
HDEF
FNDF
Consumer Defensive
HDEF
FNDF
Healthcare
HDEF
FNDF
Energy
HDEF
FNDF
Utilities
HDEF
FNDF
Industrials
HDEF
FNDF
Consumer Cyclical
HDEF
FNDF
Communication Services
HDEF
FNDF
Real Estate
HDEF
FNDF
Basic Materials
HDEF
FNDF
Technology
HDEF
FNDF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HDEF vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank
HDEF
FNDF
HDEF vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HDEF | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.45 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.06 | 3.82 | -1.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 14.27 | -8.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HDEF vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HDEF drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEF and FNDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HDEF | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.43% | -40.14% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.03% | -10.60% | +2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.15% | -13.89% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.63% | -25.56% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.43% | -40.14% | +3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.31% | -1.94% | -1.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.06% | -7.63% | +2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 2.84% | -0.14% |
Volatility
HDEF vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) is 3.52%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that HDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HDEF | FNDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.52% | 6.65% | -3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | 13.64% | -4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.79% | 16.00% | -4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 16.35% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 17.71% | -1.47% |
HDEF vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
HDEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
HDEF vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison
HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than FNDF's 2.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF | 2.87% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
HDEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF | 3.56% | 3.88% | 4.53% | 4.38% | 5.41% | 4.76% | 3.93% | 4.20% | 3.55% | 3.38% | 9.53% | 1.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HDEF and FNDF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to HDEF (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDEF dropped -36.43% vs FNDF's -40.14%.
On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 12.34% vs 9.42% for HDEF. On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.
HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.87% for FNDF.
HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HDEF and 0.25% for FNDF.
FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HDEF and FNDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer