PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDEF vs. FNDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDEF vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HDEF achieves a 6.62% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 19.66% return. Over the past 10 years, HDEF has underperformed FNDF with an annualized return of 9.42%, while FNDF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.34% annualized return.


HDEF

1D
0.09%
1M
0.83%
YTD
6.62%
6M
8.15%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
16.78%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
9.42%

FNDF

1D
0.39%
1M
2.91%
YTD
19.66%
6M
21.60%
1Y
41.60%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDEF vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
6.62%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
19.66%40.99%2.29%20.22%-7.78%14.97%3.61%18.46%-14.21%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEF and FNDF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2015

0.78

The correlation between HDEF and FNDF shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDEF vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDEF
FNDF

Financial Services

26.5%
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

19.5%
6.5%

Healthcare

17.0%
5.2%

Energy

11.4%
10.9%

Utilities

7.8%
3.5%

Industrials

7.7%
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.1%
10.8%

Communication Services

3.9%
4.9%

Real Estate

0.8%
0.8%

Basic Materials

0.6%
11.3%

Technology

0.6%
14.4%

Financial Services

HDEF
26.5%
FNDF
16.2%

Consumer Defensive

HDEF
19.5%
FNDF
6.5%

Healthcare

HDEF
17.0%
FNDF
5.2%

Energy

HDEF
11.4%
FNDF
10.9%

Utilities

HDEF
7.8%
FNDF
3.5%

Industrials

HDEF
7.7%
FNDF
15.5%

Consumer Cyclical

HDEF
4.1%
FNDF
10.8%

Communication Services

HDEF
3.9%
FNDF
4.9%

Real Estate

HDEF
0.8%
FNDF
0.8%

Basic Materials

HDEF
0.6%
FNDF
11.3%

Technology

HDEF
0.6%
FNDF
14.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDEF vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDF
FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDEF vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HDEFFNDFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.45

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

3.82

-1.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

14.27

-8.15

HDEF vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HDEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is lower than the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HDEF and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HDEF vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HDEF drawdown since its inception was -36.43%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HDEF and FNDF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDEFFNDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-40.14%

+3.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-10.60%

+2.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-13.89%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

-25.56%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

-40.14%

+3.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.31%

-1.94%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-7.63%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.84%

-0.14%

Volatility

HDEF vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) is 3.52%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 6.65%. This indicates that HDEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDEFFNDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

6.65%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

13.64%

-4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

16.00%

-4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

16.35%

-2.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

17.71%

-1.47%

HDEF vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

HDEF vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than FNDF's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDF
Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF
2.87%3.44%4.01%3.41%3.10%3.54%2.17%3.20%3.47%2.32%2.42%2.08%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.56%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDEF and FNDF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FNDF has higher volatility (6.65%) compared to HDEF (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HDEF dropped -36.43% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

On 10-year performance, FNDF leads with 12.34% vs 9.42% for HDEF. On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, HDEF has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDF.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 2.87% for FNDF.

HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HDEF and 0.25% for FNDF.

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDEF and FNDF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer