PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HDEF vs. CN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HDEF vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


HDEF

1D
0.84%
1M
-1.49%
YTD
4.87%
6M
7.11%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
16.85%
5Y*
10.01%
10Y*
8.59%

CN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HDEF vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
4.87%33.01%2.85%18.53%-2.51%6.95%-1.90%25.02%-13.74%9.89%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-22.41%43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HDEF and CN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2015

0.40

The correlation between HDEF and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HDEF vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HDEF
CN

Financial Services

26.9%
55.1%

Consumer Defensive

17.9%
0.3%

Healthcare

14.0%
0.8%

Energy

13.8%
0.9%

Industrials

8.8%
1.0%

Utilities

8.4%
0.2%

Communication Services

4.0%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.9%
5.4%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.8%

Basic Materials

0.7%
0.6%

Technology

0.6%
0.3%

Financial Services

HDEF
26.9%
CN
55.1%

Consumer Defensive

HDEF
17.9%
CN
0.3%

Healthcare

HDEF
14.0%
CN
0.8%

Energy

HDEF
13.8%
CN
0.9%

Industrials

HDEF
8.8%
CN
1.0%

Utilities

HDEF
8.4%
CN
0.2%

Communication Services

HDEF
4.0%
CN
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

HDEF
3.9%
CN
5.4%

Real Estate

HDEF
0.9%
CN
0.8%

Basic Materials

HDEF
0.7%
CN
0.6%

Technology

HDEF
0.6%
CN
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HDEF vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HDEF
HDEF Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HDEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDEF Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
HDEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDEF Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

CN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HDEF vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF (HDEF) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HDEFCNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.36

HDEF vs. CN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HDEFCNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

Drawdowns

HDEF vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HDEFCNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

Volatility

HDEF vs. CN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HDEFCNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

HDEF vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HDEF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

HDEF vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

HDEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
HDEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield Equity ETF
3.62%3.88%4.53%4.38%5.41%4.76%3.93%4.20%3.55%3.38%9.53%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


HDEF and CN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HDEF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HDEF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CN.

HDEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.62%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

HDEF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CN is China Equities. HDEF tracks MSCI EAFE High Dividend Yield US Dollar Hedged Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for HDEF and 0.50% for CN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HDEF and CN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer