SRV vs. NML
SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) and NML (Neuberger Berman MLP) are both mutual funds - SRV is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by NXG, while NML is a MLPs fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SRV returned 11.81%/yr vs 10.71%/yr for NML. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SRV charges 1.00%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for NML.
Performance
SRV vs. NML - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SRV having a 29.04% return and NML slightly lower at 28.84%. Over the past 10 years, SRV has outperformed NML with an annualized return of 11.81%, while NML has yielded a comparatively lower 10.71% annualized return.
SRV
- 1D
- 4.38%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- 6M
- 22.64%
- YTD
- 29.04%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 27.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.81%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.55%
NML
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- YTD
- 28.84%
- 1Y
- 30.58%
- 3Y*
- 24.05%
- 5Y*
- 26.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.26M | $1.11M | $1.30M | |
| $3.49M | $3.96M | $3.22M |
SRV vs. NML - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 29.04% | 5.05% | 50.70% | 19.88% | 20.11% | 50.45% | -41.65% | 33.99% | -21.61% | -4.21% |
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 28.84% | 4.36% | 40.55% | 14.61% | 32.75% | 61.76% | -45.84% | 10.60% | -23.02% | 7.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRV and NML is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2013 | 0.61 |
The correlation between SRV and NML shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.64 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRV vs. NML — Risk / Return Rank
SRV
NML
SRV vs. NML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) and Neuberger Berman MLP (NML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRV | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 3.08 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.32 | 8.41 | -2.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRV vs. NML - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRV drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, roughly equal to the maximum NML drawdown of -90.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRV and NML.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRV | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.97% | -90.48% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -9.57% | -3.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.26% | -16.92% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | -21.40% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.70% | -84.84% | +3.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | -2.43% | -7.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.41% | -36.68% | -11.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.81% | 3.51% | +1.30% |
Volatility
SRV vs. NML - Volatility Comparison
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to Neuberger Berman MLP (NML) at 6.97%. This indicates that SRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRV | NML | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.35% | 6.97% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.97% | 14.90% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.49% | 18.33% | +3.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 23.73% | +2.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.35% | 35.00% | +3.35% |
SRV vs. NML - Expense Ratio Comparison
SRV has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than NML's 2.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
SRV vs. NML - Dividend Comparison
SRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.27%, more than NML's 7.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NML Neuberger Berman MLP | 7.15% | 8.24% | 7.94% | 10.19% | 4.26% | 3.54% | 8.33% | 9.76% | 9.87% | 7.04% | 8.63% | 15.44% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 16.27% | 19.31% | 12.85% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRV and NML have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRV has higher volatility (9.35%) compared to NML (6.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRV dropped -92.97% vs NML's -90.48%.
NML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRV and NML
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer