SRV vs. NXG
SRV (NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund) and NXG (NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund) are both mutual funds - SRV is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by NXG, while NXG is a Global Equity Income fund actively managed by NXG. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, SRV returned 29.01%/yr vs 35.87%/yr for NXG. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.00% expense ratio.
Performance
SRV vs. NXG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SRV achieves a 31.36% return, which is significantly higher than NXG's 24.88% return.
SRV
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 31.36%
- 6M
- 36.75%
- 1Y
- 36.76%
- 3Y*
- 29.01%
- 5Y*
- 25.60%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
NXG
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 24.88%
- 6M
- 26.97%
- 1Y
- 38.01%
- 3Y*
- 35.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SRV vs. NXG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 31.36% | 5.05% | 50.70% | 19.88% | -4.92% |
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 24.88% | 25.98% | 51.16% | 4.54% | -4.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SRV and NXG is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2022 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SRV vs. NXG — Risk / Return Rank
SRV
NXG
SRV vs. NXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) and NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SRV | NXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.35 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.90 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 7.89 | +0.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SRV vs. NXG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SRV drawdown since its inception was -92.97%, which is greater than NXG's maximum drawdown of -26.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SRV and NXG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SRV | NXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.97% | -26.14% | -66.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.13% | -13.19% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.26% | -26.14% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.36% | -0.54% | -7.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.66% | -6.54% | -42.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.62% | 4.83% | -0.21% |
Volatility
SRV vs. NXG - Volatility Comparison
NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund (SRV) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund (NXG) at 5.17%. This indicates that SRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SRV | NXG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 5.17% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.77% | 13.84% | +1.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.56% | 19.41% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 26.77% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.31% | 26.77% | +11.54% |
SRV vs. NXG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SRV and NXG have an expense ratio of 1.00%.
Dividends
SRV vs. NXG - Dividend Comparison
SRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.72%, more than NXG's 11.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXG NXG NextGen Infrastructure Income Fund | 11.01% | 12.83% | 14.15% | 12.00% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRV NXG Cushing® Midstream Energy Fund | 15.72% | 19.31% | 12.85% | 15.56% | 8.85% | 4.72% | 12.05% | 10.59% | 12.73% | 9.07% | 7.95% | 11.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SRV and NXG have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SRV has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to NXG (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SRV dropped -92.97% vs NXG's -26.14%.
NXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SRV and NXG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer