HCSG vs. HUMN
HCSG (Healthcare Services Group, Inc.) is a stock, while HUMN (Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF) is Robotics fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past year, HCSG returned 89.28% vs 24.86% for HUMN. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HCSG vs. HUMN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HCSG achieves a 30.67% return, which is significantly higher than HUMN's 4.29% return.
HCSG
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 29.32%
- YTD
- 30.67%
- 1Y
- 89.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- -2.19%
- 10Y*
- -2.22%
HUMN
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -13.14%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HCSG vs. HUMN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HCSG Healthcare Services Group, Inc. | 30.67% | 29.98% |
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 4.29% | 20.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between HCSG and HUMN is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HCSG vs. HUMN — Risk / Return Rank
HCSG
HUMN
HCSG vs. HUMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Healthcare Services Group, Inc. (HCSG) and Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HCSG | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.15 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 1.22 | +3.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.74 | 3.28 | +9.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HCSG vs. HUMN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HCSG drawdown since its inception was -81.04%, which is greater than HUMN's maximum drawdown of -20.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCSG and HUMN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HCSG | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.04% | -20.40% | -60.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.88% | -20.40% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -81.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.18% | -19.99% | -27.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.05% | -5.27% | -26.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.04% | 7.60% | -0.56% |
Volatility
HCSG vs. HUMN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Healthcare Services Group, Inc. (HCSG) is 7.82%, while Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF (HUMN) has a volatility of 15.68%. This indicates that HCSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HCSG | HUMN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.82% | 15.68% | -7.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.41% | 28.77% | +2.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.43% | 33.93% | +10.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.17% | 33.27% | +8.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.52% | 33.27% | +7.25% |
Dividends
HCSG vs. HUMN - Dividend Comparison
HCSG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HCSG Healthcare Services Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.10% | 4.68% | 2.89% | 3.26% | 1.92% | 1.43% | 1.87% | 2.04% |
HUMN Roundhill Humanoid Robotics ETF | 0.69% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HCSG and HUMN have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HUMN has higher volatility (15.68%) compared to HCSG (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCSG dropped -81.04% vs HUMN's -20.40%.
HCSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HCSG and HUMN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer