PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCOW vs. ILCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HCOW vs. ILCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HCOW vs. ILCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
-1.90%5.76%7.63%6.44%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
-0.92%18.79%17.03%6.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCOW achieves a -1.90% return, which is significantly lower than ILCV's -0.92% return.


HCOW

1D
1.72%
1M
-4.68%
YTD
-1.90%
6M
1.78%
1Y
8.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ILCV

1D
1.96%
1M
-4.49%
YTD
-0.92%
6M
4.39%
1Y
16.47%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HCOW vs. ILCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HCOW has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCV's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HCOW vs. ILCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCOW
HCOW Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
HCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCV
ILCV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ILCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCOW vs. ILCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) and iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCOWILCVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.39

1.08

-0.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.70

1.57

-0.87

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.50

-0.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.09

7.14

-5.05

HCOW vs. ILCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCOW Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the ILCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCOW and ILCV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCOWILCVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

1.08

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.44

-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between HCOW and ILCV is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

HCOW vs. ILCV - Dividend Comparison

HCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.93%, more than ILCV's 1.77% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCOW
Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF
11.93%10.88%8.13%1.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ILCV
iShares Morningstar Value ETF
1.77%1.77%1.99%2.27%2.32%2.01%2.96%2.70%2.93%2.32%2.76%3.01%

Drawdowns

HCOW vs. ILCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCOW drawdown since its inception was -24.15%, smaller than the maximum ILCV drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCOW and ILCV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HCOWILCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.15%

-58.63%

+34.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.36%

-11.82%

-4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.68%

-4.72%

+0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-9.39%

+4.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.34%

2.48%

+1.86%

Volatility

HCOW vs. ILCV - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Cash Flow High Income ETF (HCOW) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to iShares Morningstar Value ETF (ILCV) at 3.81%. This indicates that HCOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HCOWILCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

3.81%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.26%

7.65%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.94%

15.31%

+5.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

14.26%

+3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.93%

16.68%

+1.25%