PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITC vs. HODL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITC vs. HODL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITC vs. HODL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
-0.39%-20.46%79.58%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
-22.04%-6.42%99.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BITC achieves a -0.39% return, which is significantly higher than HODL's -22.04% return.


BITC

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
-0.39%
6M
-17.21%
1Y
-9.45%
3Y*
30.37%
5Y*
10Y*

HODL

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.38%
YTD
-22.04%
6M
-42.00%
1Y
-19.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITC vs. HODL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITC has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than HODL's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BITC vs. HODL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITC
BITC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BITC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITC Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BITC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITC Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

HODL
HODL Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
HODL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HODL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
HODL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HODL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HODL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITC vs. HODL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITCHODLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.36

-0.44

+0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.33

-0.37

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

0.96

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.36

-0.35

-0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.58

-0.75

+0.16

BITC vs. HODL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITC Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is comparable to the HODL Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITC and HODL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITCHODLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

-0.44

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.37

+0.27

Correlation

The correlation between BITC and HODL is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BITC vs. HODL - Dividend Comparison

BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, while HODL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023
BITC
Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF
3.38%3.36%42.68%5.82%
HODL
VanEck Bitcoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BITC vs. HODL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITC drawdown since its inception was -38.51%, smaller than the maximum HODL drawdown of -49.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITC and HODL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITCHODLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.51%

-49.25%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.51%

-49.25%

+22.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.54%

-45.67%

+14.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.81%

-14.14%

-1.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.53%

23.20%

-6.67%

Volatility

BITC vs. HODL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC) is 12.07%, while VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) has a volatility of 12.99%. This indicates that BITC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HODL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITCHODLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.07%

12.99%

-0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.16%

36.72%

-17.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.66%

45.07%

-18.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.60%

50.90%

-3.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.60%

50.90%

-3.30%