PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCI vs. PWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HCI vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCI achieves a -15.87% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 67.76% return. Over the past 10 years, HCI has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 21.75%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 41.17% annualized return.


HCI

1D
-1.03%
1M
4.62%
YTD
-15.87%
6M
-13.97%
1Y
2.02%
3Y*
42.68%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
21.75%

PWR

1D
3.58%
1M
-8.53%
YTD
67.76%
6M
61.62%
1Y
97.52%
3Y*
56.60%
5Y*
50.60%
10Y*
41.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCI vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.
-15.87%66.27%35.46%126.76%-51.20%62.74%18.45%-6.80%75.98%-21.53%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
67.76%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between HCI and PWR is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2008

0.19

The correlation between HCI and PWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.21 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HCI:

$2.07B

PWR:

$107.64B

EPS

HCI:

$24.40

PWR:

$7.29

PE Ratio

HCI:

6.58

PWR:

97.08

PEG Ratio

HCI:

0.01

PWR:

4.81

PS Ratio

HCI:

2.23

PWR:

3.58

PB Ratio

HCI:

1.90

PWR:

11.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

HCI:

$927.48M

PWR:

$29.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HCI:

$617.14M

PWR:

$4.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

HCI:

$459.34M

PWR:

$2.40B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCI vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCI
HCI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCI vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HCIPWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.44

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

5.73

-5.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

18.09

-17.96

HCI vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCI and PWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HCI vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCI drawdown since its inception was -78.79%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCI and PWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCIPWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.79%

-97.07%

+18.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.46%

-17.11%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.30%

-33.89%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.79%

-33.89%

-44.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.79%

-45.53%

-33.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.68%

-9.87%

-11.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.67%

-46.84%

+26.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.31%

5.41%

+10.90%

Volatility

HCI vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) is 7.53%, while Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a volatility of 13.07%. This indicates that HCI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCIPWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

13.07%

-5.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.38%

30.74%

-9.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.83%

37.12%

-5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.03%

35.79%

+7.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.57%

33.78%

+7.79%

Dividends

HCI vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

HCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than PWR's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.
1.00%0.83%1.37%1.83%4.04%1.92%3.06%3.50%2.90%4.68%3.04%3.44%
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HCI vs. PWR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between HCI Group, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
242.88M
7.87B
(HCI) Total Revenue
(PWR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HCI vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between HCI Group, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
73.0%
14.1%
Portfolio components
HCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HCI Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.28M and revenue of 242.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.11B and revenue of 7.87B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.1%.

HCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HCI Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 115.38M and revenue of 242.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.5%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 338.78M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

HCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HCI Group, Inc. reported a net income of 85.04M and revenue of 242.88M, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 220.63M and revenue of 7.87B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HCI and PWR have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWR has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to HCI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCI dropped -78.79% vs PWR's -97.07%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCI and PWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer