HBTC vs. QSOL
HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTC is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Fortuna Funds, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. HBTC is actively managed, while QSOL is passively managed. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
HBTC vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -21.27% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -41.51% return.
HBTC
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -14.07%
- YTD
- -21.27%
- 6M
- -26.23%
- 1Y
- -31.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL
- 1D
- -4.67%
- 1M
- -14.50%
- YTD
- -41.51%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBTC vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | -21.27% | -0.01% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -41.51% | -0.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBTC and QSOL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2025 | 0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBTC vs. QSOL — Risk / Return Rank
HBTC
QSOL
HBTC vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBTC | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.58 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBTC | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.58 | -0.99 | +0.41 |
Drawdowns
HBTC vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -37.82%, smaller than the maximum QSOL drawdown of -50.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBTC | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.82% | -50.82% | +13.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.82% | -50.82% | +13.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.38% | -31.98% | +17.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.05% | — | — |
Volatility
HBTC vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBTC | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.95% | 70.59% | -41.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.66% | 70.59% | -40.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.66% | 70.59% | -40.93% |
HBTC vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBTC vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.92%, more than QSOL's 0.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF | 13.92% | 10.96% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.20% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBTC and QSOL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for HBTC.
HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 13.92%, compared with 0.20% for QSOL.
HBTC is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for HBTC and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer