HBTC vs. QBF

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and QBF (Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly) are both Blockchain funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBTC returned -36.06% vs -43.84% for QBF. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QBF.

Performance

HBTC vs. QBF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -20.61% return, which is significantly higher than QBF's -27.57% return.

HBTC

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 3.54%
• 6M: -22.35%
• YTD: -20.61%
• 1Y: -36.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QBF

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -2.63%
• 6M: -28.86%
• YTD: -27.57%
• 1Y: -43.84%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTC vs. QBF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	-20.61%	1.18%
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	-27.57%	-0.69%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTC and QBF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	0.92

The correlation between HBTC and QBF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

HBTC vs. QBF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTC

HBTC Risk / Return Rank: 1
HBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
HBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

QBF

QBF Risk / Return Rank: 1
QBF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Omega Ratio Rank: 0
QBF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
QBF Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTC vs. QBF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBTC	QBF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.20	-1.54	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.81	-2.39	+0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	0.74	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	-0.87	+0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	-1.50	+0.06

HBTC vs. QBF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBTC Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is comparable to the QBF Sharpe Ratio of -1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBTC and QBF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HBTC vs. QBF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -40.45%, smaller than the maximum QBF drawdown of -48.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and QBF.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBTC	QBF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.45%	-48.71%	+8.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.45%	-48.71%	+8.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.30%	-45.86%	+8.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.22%	-18.80%	+2.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.54%	28.15%	-4.61%

Volatility

HBTC vs. QBF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) is 4.80%, while Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly (QBF) has a volatility of 9.44%. This indicates that HBTC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HBTC	QBF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	9.44%	-4.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.97%	20.75%	-1.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.11%	27.41%	+0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.81%	29.00%	-0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.81%	29.00%	-0.19%

HBTC vs. QBF - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QBF's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBTC vs. QBF - Dividend Comparison

HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.80%, more than QBF's 1.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	13.80%	10.96%
QBF Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Floor ETF - Quarterly	1.91%	1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBTC and QBF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, HBTC and QBF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HBTC or QBF?

QBF has higher volatility (9.44%) compared to HBTC (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBTC dropped -40.45% vs QBF's -48.71%.

Which ETF is better, HBTC or QBF?

On 1-year performance, HBTC leads with -36.06% vs -43.84% for QBF. On fees, QBF is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, HBTC has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HBTC or QBF?

Over the 1-year period, HBTC has performed better with a -36.06% return vs -43.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBTC or QBF?

QBF is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for HBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HBTC or QBF?

HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 13.80%, compared with 1.91% for QBF.

What is the main difference between HBTC and QBF?

They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 0.79% for QBF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HBTC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.20 vs -1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.