HBTC vs. CIFU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HBTC (Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF) and CIFU (T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBTC is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Fortuna Funds, while CIFU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by REX. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBTC charges 1.75%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for CIFU.

Performance

HBTC vs. CIFU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBTC achieves a -24.27% return, which is significantly lower than CIFU's 94.41% return.

HBTC

• 1D: -0.42%
• 1M: -13.17%
• YTD: -24.27%
• 6M: -24.71%
• 1Y: -32.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFU

• 1D: -4.06%
• 1M: 42.63%
• YTD: 94.41%
• 6M: 64.26%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBTC vs. CIFU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	-24.27%	-1.28%
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	94.41%	-13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between HBTC and CIFU is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

HBTC vs. CIFU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBTC

HBTC Risk / Return Rank: 1
HBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 1
HBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
HBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 1

CIFU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBTC vs. CIFU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF (HBTC) and T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF (CIFU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HBTC	CIFU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.14	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.71	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.80	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.47	—	—

Drawdowns

HBTC vs. CIFU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBTC drawdown since its inception was -40.19%, smaller than the maximum CIFU drawdown of -77.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBTC and CIFU.

Drawdown Indicators

	HBTC	CIFU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.19%	-77.20%	+37.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.19%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.19%	-10.48%	-29.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.35%	-42.93%	+27.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.93%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	HBTC	CIFU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.26%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.47%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.29%	207.07%	-178.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.10%	207.07%	-177.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.10%	207.07%	-177.97%

HBTC vs. CIFU - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBTC has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFU's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

HBTC vs. CIFU - Dividend Comparison

HBTC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.47%, while CIFU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CIFU T-REX 2X Long CIFR Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%
HBTC Fortuna Hedged Bitcoin ETF	14.47%	10.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HBTC and CIFU in my portfolio?

HBTC and CIFU have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, HBTC or CIFU?

On fees, CIFU is cheaper at 1.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, HBTC or CIFU?

CIFU is cheaper with a 1.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for HBTC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HBTC or CIFU?

HBTC has the higher dividend yield at 14.47%, compared with 0.00% for CIFU.

What is the main difference between HBTC and CIFU?

HBTC is categorized as Blockchain, while CIFU is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fortuna Funds and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for HBTC and 1.50% for CIFU.