HBND.TO vs. CSHI
Compare and contrast key facts about Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI).
HBND.TO and CSHI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBND.TO is an actively managed fund by Hamilton Capital. It was launched on Aug 21, 2024. CSHI is a passively managed fund by Neos that tracks the performance of the NONE. It was launched on Aug 29, 2022.
Performance
HBND.TO vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HBND.TO vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HBND.TO Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) | -1.01% | 4.05% | -7.02% | 4.80% |
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 2.67% | 0.23% | 14.74% | -0.43% |
Different Trading Currencies
HBND.TO is traded in CAD, while CSHI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSHI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBND.TO achieves a -1.01% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 2.67% return.
HBND.TO
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -1.85%
- 1Y
- -1.37%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSHI
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 2.48%
- 1Y
- 1.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HBND.TO vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBND.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HBND.TO vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank
HBND.TO
CSHI
HBND.TO vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBND.TO | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | 0.36 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | 0.51 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.07 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 0.55 | -0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.16 | 1.06 | -1.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBND.TO | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 | 0.36 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 1.23 | -1.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between HBND.TO and CSHI is -0.16. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
HBND.TO vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison
HBND.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.88%, more than CSHI's 4.98% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBND.TO Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) | 10.88% | 11.84% | 11.51% | 2.41% | 0.00% |
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF | 4.98% | 5.11% | 5.72% | 6.15% | 1.52% |
Drawdowns
HBND.TO vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBND.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.65%, which is greater than CSHI's maximum drawdown of -4.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBND.TO and CSHI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBND.TO | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.65% | -1.69% | -11.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.60% | -1.69% | -6.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.67% | 0.00% | -8.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.39% | -0.03% | -6.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 0.19% | +3.76% |
Volatility
HBND.TO vs. CSHI - Volatility Comparison
Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI) at 1.42%. This indicates that HBND.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HBND.TO | CSHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 1.42% | +2.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.93% | 3.57% | +2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.30% | 5.36% | +4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.57% | 5.98% | +5.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.57% | 5.98% | +5.59% |