PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBND.TO vs. SCHZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBND.TO vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

HBND.TO is traded in CAD, while SCHZ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHZ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBND.TO achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHZ's 1.57% return.


HBND.TO

1D
-0.45%
1M
0.70%
YTD
-0.30%
6M
-1.71%
1Y
4.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHZ

1D
0.24%
1M
2.27%
YTD
1.57%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
5.15%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
2.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBND.TO vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HBND.TO
Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)
-0.30%4.05%-7.02%4.80%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
1.57%2.32%9.96%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between HBND.TO and SCHZ is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023

0.59

The correlation between HBND.TO and SCHZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBND.TO vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBND.TO
HBND.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HBND.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBND.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBND.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HBND.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBND.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHZ
SCHZ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SCHZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBND.TO vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBND.TOSCHZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.21

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.50

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

3.41

-1.52

HBND.TO vs. SCHZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBND.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the SCHZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBND.TO and SCHZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBND.TOSCHZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

1.20

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.56

-0.53

Drawdowns

HBND.TO vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBND.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.65%, smaller than the maximum SCHZ drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBND.TO and SCHZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBND.TOSCHZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.65%

-20.05%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.76%

-4.36%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.01%

-1.83%

-6.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.50%

-6.53%

+0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

1.91%

+0.68%

Volatility

HBND.TO vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged) (HBND.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.74% compared to Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) at 1.31%. This indicates that HBND.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBND.TOSCHZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.74%

1.31%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.72%

4.19%

+1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.70%

5.46%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.34%

7.80%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.34%

7.89%

+3.45%

HBND.TO vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBND.TO has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBND.TO vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison

HBND.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, more than SCHZ's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HBND.TO
Hamilton U.S. Bond YIELD MAXIMIZER ETF (CAD Hedged)
11.34%11.84%11.51%2.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHZ
Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
4.12%4.05%3.96%3.28%2.63%2.16%2.43%2.79%2.56%2.40%2.24%2.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBND.TO and SCHZ have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCHZ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for HBND.TO.

HBND.TO is categorized as Government Bonds, while SCHZ is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Hamilton Capital and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for HBND.TO and 0.03% for SCHZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBND.TO and SCHZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer