PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBNC vs. BMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HBNC vs. BMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBNC achieves a 23.87% return, which is significantly higher than BMA's 5.94% return. Over the past 10 years, HBNC has outperformed BMA with an annualized return of 9.18%, while BMA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.23% annualized return.


HBNC

1D
-0.63%
1M
3.39%
6M
18.10%
YTD
23.87%
1Y
41.38%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
9.18%
ALL TIME*
10.78%

BMA

1D
-2.47%
1M
2.44%
6M
-6.61%
YTD
5.94%
1Y
45.12%
3Y*
66.06%
5Y*
57.72%
10Y*
7.23%
ALL TIME*
11.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$22.59M$20.98M$24.29M
$16.16M$13.52M$11.83M

HBNC vs. BMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HBNC
Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
23.87%9.76%18.19%0.43%-25.26%35.43%-12.86%23.69%-13.14%1.06%
BMA
Banco Macro S.A.
5.94%-3.55%277.79%91.62%27.04%-9.96%-57.05%-14.00%-60.72%81.54%

Correlation

The correlation between HBNC and BMA is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2006

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HBNC:

$1.05B

BMA:

$5.88B

EPS

HBNC:

-$2.86

BMA:

ARS 5.81K

PB Ratio

HBNC:

0.56

BMA:

1.49

Total Revenue (TTM)

HBNC:

-$5.09M

BMA:

ARS 4.76T

Gross Profit (TTM)

HBNC:

-$86.58M

BMA:

ARS 2.84T

EBITDA (TTM)

HBNC:

-$210.22M

BMA:

ARS 751.84B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBNC vs. BMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HBNC
HBNC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HBNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HBNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBNC Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BMA
BMA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
BMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
BMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMA Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HBNC vs. BMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HBNCBMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.17

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

0.86

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.70

1.91

+4.79

HBNC vs. BMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBNC Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the BMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBNC and BMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HBNC vs. BMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBNC drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum BMA drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBNC and BMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBNCBMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.21%

-91.66%

+26.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.65%

-47.38%

+30.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.61%

-65.40%

+35.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.21%

-65.40%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.21%

-91.66%

+26.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-14.66%

+13.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.05%

-44.61%

+27.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.54%

21.35%

-15.81%

Volatility

HBNC vs. BMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) is 6.41%, while Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a volatility of 16.58%. This indicates that HBNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBNCBMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

16.58%

-10.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.05%

40.83%

-23.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.32%

75.00%

-47.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.54%

59.88%

-24.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.88%

62.53%

-25.65%

Dividends

HBNC vs. BMA - Dividend Comparison

HBNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, less than BMA's 5.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BMA
Banco Macro S.A.
5.35%2.38%6.10%7.75%7.28%0.00%0.00%6.20%5.05%0.65%1.53%0.00%
HBNC
Horizon Bancorp, Inc.
3.13%3.77%3.97%4.47%4.11%2.54%3.03%2.32%2.45%1.73%1.43%1.54%

Financials

HBNC vs. BMA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Horizon Bancorp, Inc. and Banco Macro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HBNC and BMA have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMA has higher volatility (16.58%) compared to HBNC (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBNC dropped -65.21% vs BMA's -91.66%.

HBNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBNC and BMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer