HBNC vs. BMA
HBNC (Horizon Bancorp, Inc.) and BMA (Banco Macro S.A.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Banks - Regional industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, HBNC returned 9.80%/yr vs 7.89%/yr for BMA. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HBNC vs. BMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBNC achieves a 18.27% return, which is significantly higher than BMA's 7.73% return. Over the past 10 years, HBNC has outperformed BMA with an annualized return of 9.80%, while BMA has yielded a comparatively lower 7.89% annualized return.
HBNC
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 18.27%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 35.61%
- 3Y*
- 29.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
BMA
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- 24.52%
- YTD
- 7.73%
- 6M
- 7.60%
- 1Y
- 45.58%
- 3Y*
- 69.62%
- 5Y*
- 52.24%
- 10Y*
- 7.89%
HBNC vs. BMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBNC Horizon Bancorp, Inc. | 18.27% | 9.76% | 18.19% | 0.43% | -25.26% | 35.43% | -12.86% | 23.69% | -13.14% | 1.06% |
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 7.73% | -3.55% | 277.79% | 91.62% | 27.04% | -9.96% | -57.05% | -14.00% | -60.72% | 81.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBNC and BMA is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2006 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
HBNC:
$1.01B
BMA:
$6.01B
HBNC:
-$3.06
BMA:
ARS 5.81K
HBNC:
0.53
BMA:
1.50
HBNC:
-$1.82M
BMA:
ARS 4.76T
HBNC:
-$97.09M
BMA:
ARS 2.84T
HBNC:
-$218.68M
BMA:
ARS 751.84B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBNC vs. BMA — Risk / Return Rank
HBNC
BMA
HBNC vs. BMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBNC | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.19 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 0.97 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 2.15 | +4.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBNC vs. BMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBNC drawdown since its inception was -65.21%, smaller than the maximum BMA drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBNC and BMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBNC | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.21% | -91.66% | +26.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.65% | -47.38% | +30.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.61% | -65.40% | +35.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.21% | -65.40% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.21% | -91.66% | +26.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -13.22% | +12.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.12% | -44.77% | +27.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 21.25% | -15.52% |
Volatility
HBNC vs. BMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Horizon Bancorp, Inc. (HBNC) is 6.63%, while Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a volatility of 17.97%. This indicates that HBNC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBNC | BMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 17.97% | -11.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.61% | 39.49% | -20.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.69% | 74.66% | -46.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.71% | 59.68% | -23.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.90% | 62.38% | -25.48% |
Dividends
HBNC vs. BMA - Dividend Comparison
HBNC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than BMA's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMA Banco Macro S.A. | 5.09% | 2.38% | 6.10% | 7.75% | 7.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.20% | 5.05% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 0.00% |
HBNC Horizon Bancorp, Inc. | 3.25% | 3.77% | 3.97% | 4.47% | 4.11% | 2.54% | 3.03% | 2.32% | 2.45% | 1.73% | 1.43% | 1.54% |
Financials
HBNC vs. BMA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Horizon Bancorp, Inc. and Banco Macro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HBNC and BMA have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BMA has higher volatility (17.97%) compared to HBNC (6.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBNC dropped -65.21% vs BMA's -91.66%.
HBNC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBNC and BMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer