PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBM vs. GDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBM vs. GDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBM achieves a 40.23% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's -6.69% return. Over the past 10 years, HBM has outperformed GDX with an annualized return of 19.31%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.29% annualized return.


HBM

1D
4.43%
1M
0.32%
YTD
40.23%
6M
49.02%
1Y
189.83%
3Y*
78.89%
5Y*
31.42%
10Y*
19.31%

GDX

1D
2.97%
1M
-16.83%
YTD
-6.69%
6M
-5.89%
1Y
50.59%
3Y*
38.96%
5Y*
17.51%
10Y*
13.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBM vs. GDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
40.23%145.46%47.03%9.24%-29.87%3.82%69.50%-11.77%-46.20%54.77%
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
-6.69%154.77%10.63%9.98%-9.01%-9.52%23.66%39.84%-8.77%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between HBM and GDX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2009

0.43

Over the past year, HBM and GDX have become more correlated (0.69) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBM vs. GDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBM
HBM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
HBM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HBM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBM Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GDX
GDX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
GDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBM vs. GDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) and VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HBMGDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.21

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

1.40

+3.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.41

3.87

+12.54

HBM vs. GDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HBM Sharpe Ratio is 3.23, which is higher than the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HBM and GDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HBM vs. GDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBM drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, which is greater than GDX's maximum drawdown of -80.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBM and GDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBMGDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.21%

-80.34%

-11.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.16%

-36.28%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.11%

-36.28%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.33%

-46.51%

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.34%

-49.79%

-36.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.68%

-30.91%

+18.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-52.45%

-40.41%

-12.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.62%

13.11%

-1.49%

Volatility

HBM vs. GDX - Volatility Comparison

Hudbay Minerals Inc. (HBM) has a higher volatility of 25.87% compared to VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX) at 17.20%. This indicates that HBM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBMGDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.87%

17.20%

+8.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.72%

39.15%

+8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.13%

46.89%

+12.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.51%

36.74%

+18.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

58.82%

37.34%

+21.48%

Dividends

HBM vs. GDX - Dividend Comparison

HBM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than GDX's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
0.79%0.74%1.19%1.61%1.66%1.67%0.53%0.67%0.50%0.76%0.26%0.85%
HBM
Hudbay Minerals Inc.
0.08%0.07%0.17%0.31%0.32%0.22%0.21%0.36%0.38%0.23%0.35%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBM and GDX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HBM has higher volatility (25.87%) compared to GDX (17.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBM dropped -92.21% vs GDX's -80.34%.

HBM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBM and GDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer