HBIX.NEO vs. LLYH.TO
HBIX.NEO (Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF) and LLYH.TO (Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units) are both exchange-traded funds - HBIX.NEO is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Harvest, while LLYH.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Harvest. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, HBIX.NEO returned -49.32% vs 48.03% for LLYH.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBIX.NEO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LLYH.TO.
Performance
HBIX.NEO vs. LLYH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBIX.NEO achieves a -29.09% return, which is significantly lower than LLYH.TO's 13.66% return.
HBIX.NEO
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- -36.75%
- YTD
- -29.09%
- 1Y
- -49.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LLYH.TO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- YTD
- 13.66%
- 1Y
- 48.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBIX.NEO vs. LLYH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | -29.09% | -9.56% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 13.66% | 23.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBIX.NEO and LLYH.TO is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBIX.NEO vs. LLYH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
HBIX.NEO
LLYH.TO
HBIX.NEO vs. LLYH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) and Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBIX.NEO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.28 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 2.30 | -3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 6.28 | -7.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBIX.NEO vs. LLYH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBIX.NEO drawdown since its inception was -57.28%, which is greater than LLYH.TO's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBIX.NEO and LLYH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBIX.NEO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.28% | -31.00% | -26.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.28% | -20.97% | -36.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -53.05% | -4.00% | -49.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.08% | -9.62% | -17.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.87% | 7.66% | +29.21% |
Volatility
HBIX.NEO vs. LLYH.TO - Volatility Comparison
Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF (HBIX.NEO) has a higher volatility of 11.80% compared to Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units (LLYH.TO) at 8.16%. This indicates that HBIX.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLYH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBIX.NEO | LLYH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.80% | 8.16% | +3.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.56% | 25.01% | +16.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.90% | 33.75% | +19.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.51% | 33.36% | +17.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.51% | 33.36% | +17.15% |
HBIX.NEO vs. LLYH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBIX.NEO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than LLYH.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBIX.NEO vs. LLYH.TO - Dividend Comparison
HBIX.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.10%, more than LLYH.TO's 16.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HBIX.NEO Harvest Bitcoin Enhanced Income ETF | 44.10% | 20.21% | 0.00% |
LLYH.TO Harvest Eli Lilly High Income Shares ETF Class A Units | 16.38% | 17.54% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBIX.NEO and LLYH.TO have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LLYH.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LLYH.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for HBIX.NEO.
HBIX.NEO is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while LLYH.TO is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for HBIX.NEO and 0.40% for LLYH.TO.
Find the right allocation for HBIX.NEO and LLYH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer