PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBGD.TO vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HBGD.TO vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HBGD.TO vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Different Trading Currencies

HBGD.TO is traded in CAD, while BDVL is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BDVL values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBGD.TO achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than BDVL's 0.72% return.


HBGD.TO

1D
1.84%
1M
-11.13%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
5.49%
1Y
84.40%
3Y*
43.43%
5Y*
38.80%
10Y*

BDVL

1D
1.96%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
0.72%
6M
1.26%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HBGD.TO vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBGD.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HBGD.TO vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBGD.TO
HBGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
HBGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HBGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
HBGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
HBGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HBGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

BDVL
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBGD.TO vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HBGD.TOBDVLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.78

HBGD.TO vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBGD.TOBDVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.77

0.46

-1.23

Correlation

The correlation between HBGD.TO and BDVL is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

HBGD.TO vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

HBGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than BDVL's 2.81% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
HBGD.TO
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF
0.39%0.39%0.53%0.64%1.22%0.83%0.32%1.52%0.68%
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
2.81%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HBGD.TO vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -6.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBGD.TO and BDVL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HBGD.TOBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-7.71%

-92.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.98%

-5.45%

-94.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-99.99%

-1.17%

-98.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

Volatility

HBGD.TO vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HBGD.TOBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.10%

9.35%

+30.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

96.43%

9.35%

+87.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.08%

9.35%

+78.73%