HBGD.TO vs. IQM
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM).
HBGD.TO and IQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. HBGD.TO is managed by Global X. IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020.
Performance
HBGD.TO vs. IQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HBGD.TO vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | -0.49% | 53.48% | 15.92% | 129.66% | -56.87% | 375.98% | 121.31% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 2.55% | 24.77% | 42.29% | 37.95% | -28.61% | 24.05% | 70.03% |
Different Trading Currencies
HBGD.TO is traded in CAD, while IQM is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IQM values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBGD.TO achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 2.55% return.
HBGD.TO
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 84.40%
- 3Y*
- 43.43%
- 5Y*
- 38.80%
- 10Y*
- —
IQM
- 1D
- 6.00%
- 1M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 1.24%
- 1Y
- 50.54%
- 3Y*
- 27.34%
- 5Y*
- 17.34%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HBGD.TO vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBGD.TO has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HBGD.TO vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank
HBGD.TO
IQM
HBGD.TO vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HBGD.TO | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.12 | 1.55 | +0.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.69 | 2.11 | +0.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 3.50 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.78 | 9.45 | +1.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBGD.TO | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | 1.55 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.65 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.77 | 0.86 | -1.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between HBGD.TO and IQM is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HBGD.TO vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison
HBGD.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBGD.TO Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.53% | 0.64% | 1.22% | 0.83% | 0.32% | 1.52% | 0.68% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HBGD.TO vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBGD.TO drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than IQM's maximum drawdown of -41.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBGD.TO and IQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBGD.TO | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -44.91% | -55.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.09% | -14.71% | -7.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.43% | -44.91% | -18.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.98% | -8.68% | -91.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -12.55% | -87.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 4.70% | +2.84% |
Volatility
HBGD.TO vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison
Global X Big Data & Hardware Index ETF (HBGD.TO) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) have volatilities of 13.09% and 12.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HBGD.TO | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 12.79% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.05% | 23.14% | +5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.10% | 32.78% | +7.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.43% | 26.88% | +69.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.08% | 28.46% | +59.62% |