HBDC vs. VCIT
HBDC (Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF) and VCIT (Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. HBDC is actively managed, while VCIT is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VCIT.
Performance
HBDC vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBDC achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's 0.18% return.
HBDC
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCIT
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 6.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
HBDC vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBDC Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF | 0.22% | 2.66% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 0.18% | 5.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBDC and VCIT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBDC vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank
HBDC
VCIT
HBDC vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF (HBDC) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBDC | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.75 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
HBDC vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBDC drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBDC and VCIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBDC | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -20.56% | +17.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -1.36% | +0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -3.16% | +2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.88% | — |
Volatility
HBDC vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBDC | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.38% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99% | 4.10% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.99% | 6.61% | -3.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.99% | 6.28% | -3.29% |
HBDC vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBDC vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison
HBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than VCIT's 4.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBDC Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF | 4.52% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.80% | 4.62% | 4.43% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBDC and VCIT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VCIT is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HBDC.
VCIT has the higher dividend yield at 4.80%, compared with 4.52% for HBDC.
They also come from different issuers: Hilton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for HBDC and 0.04% for VCIT.
Find the right allocation for HBDC and VCIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer