HBDC vs. BSCQ
HBDC (Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. HBDC is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. Over the past year, HBDC returned 3.59% vs 4.21% for BSCQ. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
HBDC vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBDC achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.68% return.
HBDC
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.17%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- —
HBDC vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBDC Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF | 0.41% | 2.83% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.68% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBDC and BSCQ is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBDC vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
HBDC
BSCQ
HBDC vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF (HBDC) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HBDC | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 3.40 | -2.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 41.36 | -40.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 181.24 | -177.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HBDC vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBDC drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBDC and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBDC | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -16.50% | +13.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -0.10% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -0.03% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.66% | -2.83% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.02% | +0.93% |
Volatility
HBDC vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF (HBDC) has a higher volatility of 0.73% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ) at 0.12%. This indicates that HBDC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSCQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBDC | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.73% | 0.12% | +0.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | 0.42% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83% | 0.61% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 3.29% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 4.75% | -1.79% |
HBDC vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBDC vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
HBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than BSCQ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
HBDC Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF | 4.51% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBDC and BSCQ have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HBDC has higher volatility (0.73%) compared to BSCQ (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HBDC dropped -2.96% vs BSCQ's -16.50%.
On 1-year performance, BSCQ leads with 4.21% vs 3.59% for HBDC. On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSCQ has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BSCQ has performed better with a 4.21% return vs 3.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for HBDC.
HBDC has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 4.11% for BSCQ.
They also come from different issuers: Hilton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for HBDC and 0.10% for BSCQ.
BSCQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.97 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HBDC and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer