HBDC vs. SMCO
HBDC (Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF) and SMCO (Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBDC is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Hilton, while SMCO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Hilton. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HBDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for SMCO.
Performance
HBDC vs. SMCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBDC achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than SMCO's 12.31% return.
HBDC
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.84%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMCO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 12.31%
- 6M
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBDC vs. SMCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBDC Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF | 0.22% | 2.66% |
SMCO Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF | 12.31% | 8.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBDC and SMCO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBDC vs. SMCO — Risk / Return Rank
HBDC
SMCO
HBDC vs. SMCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF (HBDC) and Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF (SMCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBDC | SMCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 1.00 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
HBDC vs. SMCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBDC drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum SMCO drawdown of -22.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBDC and SMCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBDC | SMCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -22.71% | +19.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -0.37% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -3.75% | +3.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.83% | — |
Volatility
HBDC vs. SMCO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBDC | SMCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99% | 15.76% | -12.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.99% | 18.22% | -15.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.99% | 18.22% | -15.23% |
HBDC vs. SMCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCO's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBDC vs. SMCO - Dividend Comparison
HBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than SMCO's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HBDC Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF | 4.52% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMCO Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF | 0.90% | 1.01% | 0.47% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBDC and SMCO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SMCO.
HBDC has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 0.90% for SMCO.
HBDC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SMCO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for HBDC and 0.55% for SMCO.
Find the right allocation for HBDC and SMCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer