PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HBDC vs. SMCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HBDC vs. SMCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF (HBDC) and Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF (SMCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HBDC achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than SMCO's 12.31% return.


HBDC

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.51%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMCO

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.03%
YTD
12.31%
6M
11.53%
1Y
22.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HBDC vs. SMCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
HBDC
Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF
0.22%2.66%
SMCO
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF
12.31%8.91%

Correlation

The correlation between HBDC and SMCO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HBDC vs. SMCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HBDC

SMCO
SMCO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
SMCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HBDC vs. SMCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF (HBDC) and Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF (SMCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HBDC vs. SMCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HBDCSMCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

1.00

-0.01

Drawdowns

HBDC vs. SMCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HBDC drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum SMCO drawdown of -22.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBDC and SMCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HBDCSMCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-22.71%

+19.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.37%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.68%

-3.75%

+3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

Volatility

HBDC vs. SMCO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HBDCSMCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99%

15.76%

-12.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.99%

18.22%

-15.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.99%

18.22%

-15.23%

HBDC vs. SMCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HBDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SMCO's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

HBDC vs. SMCO - Dividend Comparison

HBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than SMCO's 0.90% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
HBDC
Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF
4.52%2.42%0.00%0.00%
SMCO
Hilton Small-Midcap Opportunity ETF
0.90%1.01%0.47%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


HBDC and SMCO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HBDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HBDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for SMCO.

HBDC has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 0.90% for SMCO.

HBDC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while SMCO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for HBDC and 0.55% for SMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HBDC and SMCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer