HBDC vs. PDBC
HBDC (Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HBDC is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Hilton, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. HBDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
HBDC vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HBDC achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 31.77% return.
HBDC
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- -2.18%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 31.77%
- 6M
- 30.58%
- 1Y
- 40.71%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
HBDC vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
HBDC Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF | -0.04% | 2.66% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 31.77% | 4.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between HBDC and PDBC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HBDC vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
HBDC
PDBC
HBDC vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF (HBDC) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HBDC | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.21 | +0.68 |
Drawdowns
HBDC vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HBDC drawdown since its inception was -2.96%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HBDC and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HBDC | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.96% | -49.52% | +46.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -7.67% | +7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.68% | -23.20% | +22.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.46% | — |
Volatility
HBDC vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HBDC | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.01% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.98% | 18.78% | -15.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 19.14% | -16.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 17.79% | -14.81% |
HBDC vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
HBDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
HBDC vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
HBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, more than PDBC's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HBDC Hilton BDC Corporate Bond ETF | 4.53% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.91% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HBDC and PDBC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HBDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HBDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
HBDC has the higher dividend yield at 4.53%, compared with 2.91% for PDBC.
HBDC is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Hilton and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for HBDC and 0.58% for PDBC.
Find the right allocation for HBDC and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer