PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAWX vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAWX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAWX achieves a 15.61% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 13.79% return. Over the past 10 years, HAWX has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 12.07%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.


HAWX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.61%
6M
9.66%
YTD
15.61%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
12.07%
ALL TIME*
9.97%

DGRO

1D
0.35%
1M
1.32%
6M
9.21%
YTD
13.79%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
17.09%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.38%
ALL TIME*
12.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$107.57M$103.25M$110.55M
$978.55K$1.69M$1.20M

HAWX vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
15.61%26.24%14.88%17.05%-8.59%13.40%6.92%22.75%-9.77%19.21%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
13.79%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between HAWX and DGRO is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.65

The correlation between HAWX and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.70 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HAWX vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HAWX
DGRO

Financial Services

25.4%
20.4%

Technology

21.4%
17.3%

Industrials

13.9%
11.3%

Healthcare

7.0%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
6.5%

Basic Materials

6.4%
2.5%

Energy

4.9%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

4.1%
0.1%

Utilities

2.8%
7.3%

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Financial Services

HAWX
25.4%
DGRO
20.4%

Technology

HAWX
21.4%
DGRO
17.3%

Industrials

HAWX
13.9%
DGRO
11.3%

Healthcare

HAWX
7.0%
DGRO
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

HAWX
6.8%
DGRO
6.5%

Basic Materials

HAWX
6.4%
DGRO
2.5%

Energy

HAWX
4.9%
DGRO
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

HAWX
4.9%
DGRO
11.9%

Communication Services

HAWX
4.1%
DGRO
0.1%

Utilities

HAWX
2.8%
DGRO
7.3%

Real Estate

HAWX
1.1%
DGRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAWX vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HAWX
HAWX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
HAWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
HAWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HAWX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HAWXDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.48

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.83

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.99

14.91

-1.92

HAWX vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAWX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAWX and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HAWX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAWX drawdown since its inception was -30.63%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAWX and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAWXDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.63%

-35.10%

+4.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-6.47%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.30%

-14.03%

+0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.47%

-19.31%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.63%

-35.10%

+4.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.38%

-1.01%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-3.41%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.66%

+0.85%

Volatility

HAWX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (HAWX) has a higher volatility of 4.90% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.88%. This indicates that HAWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAWXDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.90%

2.88%

+2.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.22%

7.12%

+6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

9.54%

+5.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

13.79%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.30%

16.58%

-1.28%

HAWX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAWX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAWX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

HAWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than DGRO's 1.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.89%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
HAWX
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
2.50%2.80%3.31%2.95%16.94%2.63%2.00%3.23%2.51%2.40%2.49%3.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAWX and DGRO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HAWX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to DGRO (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAWX dropped -30.63% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.38% vs 12.07% for HAWX. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 12.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HAWX.

HAWX has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 1.89% for DGRO.

HAWX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. HAWX tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA 100% Hedged to USD, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAWX and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAWX and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer