PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HARD vs. BCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HARD vs. BCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

HARD vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
HARD
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
20.41%12.19%20.48%-5.04%
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
24.37%15.07%5.47%-2.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HARD achieves a 20.41% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 24.37% return.


HARD

1D
-1.39%
1M
8.55%
YTD
20.41%
6M
18.31%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
15.77%
5Y*
10Y*

BCI

1D
0.04%
1M
11.37%
YTD
24.37%
6M
31.23%
1Y
31.71%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
13.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HARD vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

HARD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

HARD vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HARD
HARD Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
HARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HARD Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
HARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
HARD Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

BCI
BCI Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
BCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCI Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HARD vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HARDBCIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

1.87

-1.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.04

2.46

-1.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.35

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

3.52

-2.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.53

9.71

-7.18

HARD vs. BCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HARD Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the BCI Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HARD and BCI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HARDBCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

1.87

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.48

+0.42

Correlation

The correlation between HARD and BCI is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

HARD vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison

HARD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than BCI's 13.26% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HARD
Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.49%2.36%3.51%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BCI
abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
13.26%16.49%3.29%3.93%19.98%19.43%0.68%1.47%1.13%5.02%

Drawdowns

HARD vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HARD drawdown since its inception was -13.51%, smaller than the maximum BCI drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HARD and BCI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


HARDBCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.51%

-32.69%

+19.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.51%

-9.28%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

0.00%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-12.19%

+6.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

3.37%

+3.80%

Volatility

HARD vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Commodities Strategy No K-1 ETF (HARD) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 7.07%. This indicates that HARD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


HARDBCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.53%

7.07%

+4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

13.57%

+4.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.78%

17.09%

+6.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.48%

16.63%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.48%

15.57%

+1.91%