HAPS vs. REGL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) and REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAPS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAPS returned 13.97%/yr vs 12.75%/yr for REGL. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAPS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for REGL.

Performance

HAPS vs. REGL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAPS achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than REGL's 8.74% return.

HAPS

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 5.44%
• YTD: 15.94%
• 6M: 13.47%
• 1Y: 30.58%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

REGL

• 1D: 0.47%
• 1M: 2.41%
• YTD: 8.74%
• 6M: 6.88%
• 1Y: 13.76%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: 7.26%
• 10Y*: 9.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAPS vs. REGL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	15.94%	8.35%	4.08%	13.63%
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	8.74%	6.89%	12.26%	6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between HAPS and REGL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 13, 2023	0.80

The correlation between HAPS and REGL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

HAPS vs. REGL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAPS	REGL
Financial Services	17.3%	31.0%
Technology	16.8%	1.9%
Healthcare	16.1%	4.6%
Industrials	14.7%	15.2%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	10.7%
Energy	7.2%	3.1%
Real Estate	5.9%	7.8%
Basic Materials	5.7%	9.2%
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	2.8%
Communication Services	2.7%	-
Utilities	2.5%	13.7%

Return for Risk

HAPS vs. REGL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAPS

HAPS Risk / Return Rank: 64
HAPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
HAPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
HAPS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
HAPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
HAPS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

REGL

REGL Risk / Return Rank: 32
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 29
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAPS vs. REGL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAPS	REGL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	1.05	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.62	+1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.18	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	1.43	+1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.39	4.44	+5.95

HAPS vs. REGL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAPS Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the REGL Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAPS and REGL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAPS vs. REGL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAPS drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, smaller than the maximum REGL drawdown of -36.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPS and REGL.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAPS	REGL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.44%	-36.37%	+8.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.01%	-9.67%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.44%	-16.96%	-10.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.96%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.51%	+1.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.03%	-4.08%	-1.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.95%	3.11%	-0.16%

Volatility

HAPS vs. REGL - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) at 3.57%. This indicates that HAPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REGL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAPS	REGL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	3.57%	+0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	9.30%	+2.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	13.16%	+3.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.74%	16.06%	+4.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.74%	18.32%	+2.42%

HAPS vs. REGL - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAPS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than REGL's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAPS vs. REGL - Dividend Comparison

HAPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than REGL's 2.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF	0.49%	0.57%	0.72%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.14%	2.32%	2.28%	2.40%	2.32%	2.50%	2.41%	1.96%	2.09%	1.63%	1.20%	1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAPS and REGL in my portfolio?

HAPS and REGL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAPS or REGL?

HAPS has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to REGL (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPS dropped -27.44% vs REGL's -36.37%.

Which ETF is better, HAPS or REGL?

On 3-year performance, HAPS leads with 13.97% vs 12.75% for REGL. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAPS or REGL?

Over the 3-year period, HAPS has performed better with a 13.97% return vs 12.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAPS or REGL?

REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HAPS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAPS or REGL?

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.49% for HAPS.

What is the main difference between HAPS and REGL?

HAPS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while REGL is Mid Cap Value Equities. HAPS tracks Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAPS and 0.40% for REGL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAPS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.