HAPS vs. SIFI
HAPS (Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF) and SIFI (Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAPS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Human Capital Factor Small Cap Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SIFI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Harbor. HAPS is passively managed, while SIFI is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAPS returned 12.03%/yr vs 7.19%/yr for SIFI. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. HAPS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SIFI.
Performance
HAPS vs. SIFI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAPS achieves a 11.51% return, which is significantly higher than SIFI's 1.27% return.
HAPS
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 11.51%
- 6M
- 13.23%
- 1Y
- 29.51%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIFI
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAPS vs. SIFI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 11.51% | 8.35% | 4.08% | 12.44% |
SIFI Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF | 1.27% | 8.83% | 5.05% | 5.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAPS and SIFI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2023 | 0.48 |
HAPS vs. SIFI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAPS
SIFI
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
HAPS
SIFI
Healthcare
HAPS
SIFI
Technology
HAPS
SIFI
Industrials
HAPS
SIFI
Consumer Cyclical
HAPS
SIFI
Energy
HAPS
SIFI
Real Estate
HAPS
SIFI
Basic Materials
HAPS
SIFI
Communication Services
HAPS
SIFI
Consumer Defensive
HAPS
SIFI
Utilities
HAPS
SIFI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAPS vs. SIFI — Risk / Return Rank
HAPS
SIFI
HAPS vs. SIFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) and Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAPS | SIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.75 | 2.24 | -0.50 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.57 | 3.43 | -0.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.43 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 2.74 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.00 | 11.23 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAPS | SIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | 2.24 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.47 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
HAPS vs. SIFI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAPS drawdown since its inception was -27.44%, which is greater than SIFI's maximum drawdown of -14.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPS and SIFI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAPS | SIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.44% | -14.68% | -12.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.01% | -2.71% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.44% | -3.46% | -23.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.06% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.14% | -4.83% | -1.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 0.66% | +2.31% |
Volatility
HAPS vs. SIFI - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF (HAPS) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) at 1.03%. This indicates that HAPS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAPS | SIFI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 1.03% | +3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 2.48% | +9.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.98% | 3.39% | +13.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 4.94% | +15.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.83% | 4.94% | +15.89% |
HAPS vs. SIFI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAPS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SIFI's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAPS vs. SIFI - Dividend Comparison
HAPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than SIFI's 6.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAPS Harbor Human Capital Factor US Small Cap ETF | 0.51% | 0.57% | 0.72% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIFI Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF | 6.44% | 6.57% | 5.87% | 5.71% | 3.88% | 0.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAPS and SIFI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAPS has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to SIFI (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPS dropped -27.44% vs SIFI's -14.68%.
On 3-year performance, HAPS leads with 12.03% vs 7.19% for SIFI. On fees, SIFI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SIFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, HAPS has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SIFI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HAPS.
SIFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.44%, compared with 0.51% for HAPS.
HAPS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SIFI is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for HAPS and 0.50% for SIFI.
SIFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAPS and SIFI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer