HAPI vs. WINN

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HAPI (Harbor Corporate Culture ETF) and WINN (Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAPI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CIBC Human Capital Index, while WINN is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Harbor. HAPI is passively managed, while WINN is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, HAPI returned 20.53%/yr vs 20.32%/yr for WINN. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HAPI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.57%/yr for WINN.

Performance

HAPI vs. WINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAPI achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than WINN's 1.85% return.

HAPI

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: 6.59%
• 6M: 6.06%
• 1Y: 19.78%
• 3Y*: 20.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WINN

• 1D: -1.46%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 1.85%
• 6M: 0.70%
• 1Y: 13.47%
• 3Y*: 20.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAPI vs. WINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	6.59%	16.26%	27.62%	30.29%	10.38%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	1.85%	14.31%	31.64%	52.44%	-0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between HAPI and WINN is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022	0.89

The correlation between HAPI and WINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

HAPI vs. WINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAPI	WINN
Technology	32.0%	52.8%
Communication Services	14.9%	14.1%
Financial Services	12.5%	3.7%
Industrials	9.1%	6.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	12.0%
Healthcare	7.9%	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.9%	2.5%
Energy	3.0%	-
Utilities	2.7%	2.2%
Real Estate	1.5%	0.4%
Basic Materials	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

HAPI vs. WINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAPI

HAPI Risk / Return Rank: 54
HAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
HAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
HAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
HAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
HAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 62

WINN

WINN Risk / Return Rank: 22
WINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
WINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
WINN Omega Ratio Rank: 22
WINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
WINN Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAPI vs. WINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) and Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAPI	WINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	0.79	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	1.18	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.15	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.45	0.75	+1.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.39	2.29	+8.10

HAPI vs. WINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAPI Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the WINN Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAPI and WINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAPI vs. WINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAPI drawdown since its inception was -19.46%, smaller than the maximum WINN drawdown of -32.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAPI and WINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAPI	WINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.46%	-32.07%	+12.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.12%	-18.06%	+9.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	-23.66%	+4.20%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.93%	-6.85%	+3.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-9.03%	+7.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	5.89%	-3.98%

Volatility

HAPI vs. WINN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Corporate Culture ETF (HAPI) is 4.10%, while Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF (WINN) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that HAPI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAPI	WINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.10%	6.77%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.38%	13.35%	-3.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.87%	17.10%	-5.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.75%	23.79%	-8.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.75%	23.79%	-8.04%

HAPI vs. WINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAPI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WINN's 0.57% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAPI vs. WINN - Dividend Comparison

HAPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, while WINN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HAPI Harbor Corporate Culture ETF	0.81%	0.87%	0.21%	1.21%	0.29%
WINN Harbor Long-Term Growers ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAPI and WINN in my portfolio?

HAPI and WINN have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAPI or WINN?

WINN has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to HAPI (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAPI dropped -19.46% vs WINN's -32.07%.

Which ETF is better, HAPI or WINN?

On 3-year performance, HAPI leads with 20.53% vs 20.32% for WINN. On fees, HAPI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, HAPI has been the lower-risk option at 4.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAPI or WINN?

Over the 3-year period, HAPI has performed better with a 20.53% return vs 20.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAPI or WINN?

HAPI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for WINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAPI or WINN?

HAPI has the higher dividend yield at 0.81%, compared with 0.00% for WINN.

What is the main difference between HAPI and WINN?

HAPI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while WINN is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for HAPI and 0.57% for WINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.