HAP vs. VTI
HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) and VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HAP returned 11.59%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for VTI. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HAP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VTI.
Performance
HAP vs. VTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 13.98% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.59%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
HAP
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -5.29%
- YTD
- 13.98%
- 6M
- 13.40%
- 1Y
- 34.90%
- 3Y*
- 16.55%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
VTI
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 8.82%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.62%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
HAP vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 13.98% | 34.91% | -4.08% | 2.46% | 7.84% | 25.04% | 6.30% | 18.60% | -10.68% | 17.12% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 8.82% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and VTI is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2008 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between HAP and VTI has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
HAP vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HAP
VTI
Basic Materials
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
HAP
VTI
Energy
HAP
VTI
Industrials
HAP
VTI
Utilities
HAP
VTI
Consumer Defensive
HAP
VTI
Healthcare
HAP
VTI
Technology
HAP
VTI
Real Estate
HAP
VTI
Consumer Cyclical
HAP
VTI
Communication Services
HAP
-
VTI
Financial Services
HAP
-
VTI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAP vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank
HAP
VTI
HAP vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.34 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.22 | 2.73 | +1.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.62 | 12.14 | +2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAP vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and VTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -55.45% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -8.92% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | -19.30% | +2.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | -25.36% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | -35.00% | -9.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -2.85% | -5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.06% | -8.01% | -4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 2.00% | +0.39% |
Volatility
HAP vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 4.95%. This indicates that HAP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAP | VTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 4.95% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 10.05% | +2.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 12.83% | +2.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 17.51% | +0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 18.32% | +1.37% |
HAP vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAP vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison
HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.99% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.04% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAP and VTI have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HAP has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to VTI (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAP dropped -50.99% vs VTI's -55.45%.
On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.14% vs 11.59% for HAP. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.
HAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.
HAP is categorized as Energy Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HAP and 0.03% for VTI.
HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAP and VTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer