HAP vs. PWRZ
HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) and PWRZ (TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. HAP is passively managed, while PWRZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -1.00, they often move in opposite directions. HAP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for PWRZ.
Performance
HAP vs. PWRZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
HAP
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 32.23%
- 3Y*
- 15.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.93%
PWRZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HAP vs. PWRZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.17% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | -0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAP and PWRZ is -1.00, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2026 | -1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAP vs. PWRZ — Risk / Return Rank
HAP
PWRZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HAP vs. PWRZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF (PWRZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HAP | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HAP vs. PWRZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.99%, which is greater than PWRZ's maximum drawdown of -0.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and PWRZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAP | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.99% | -0.40% | -50.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.02% | -0.40% | -6.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -0.31% | -11.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.98% | — | — |
Volatility
HAP vs. PWRZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAP | PWRZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.66% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.66% | 0.62% | +15.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 0.62% | +17.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.66% | 0.62% | +19.04% |
HAP vs. PWRZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PWRZ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
HAP vs. PWRZ - Dividend Comparison
HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while PWRZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF | 1.97% | 2.27% | 2.65% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.80% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% |
PWRZ TrueShares Eagle Global Next Gen Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HAP and PWRZ have a correlation of -1.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HAP is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HAP is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRZ.
HAP has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.00% for PWRZ.
They also come from different issuers: VanEck and TrueShares. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HAP and 0.75% for PWRZ.
Find the right allocation for HAP and PWRZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer