HAP vs. GNR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

HAP (VanEck Natural Resources ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HAP is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while GNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, HAP returned 11.99%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for GNR. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. HAP charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GNR.

Performance

HAP vs. GNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAP achieves a 21.49% return, which is significantly higher than GNR's 20.27% return. Over the past 10 years, HAP has outperformed GNR with an annualized return of 11.99%, while GNR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.91% annualized return.

HAP

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 21.49%
• 6M: 23.70%
• 1Y: 46.66%
• 3Y*: 18.93%
• 5Y*: 11.51%
• 10Y*: 11.99%

GNR

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.20%
• YTD: 20.27%
• 6M: 23.12%
• 1Y: 43.10%
• 3Y*: 15.55%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 10.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAP vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	21.49%	34.91%	-4.08%	2.46%	7.84%	25.04%	6.30%	18.60%	-10.68%	17.12%
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	20.27%	28.68%	-8.27%	2.95%	10.20%	24.73%	-0.03%	16.49%	-13.19%	22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between HAP and GNR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010	0.95

The correlation between HAP and GNR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

HAP vs. GNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	HAP	GNR
Basic Materials	36.7%	50.3%
Energy	32.3%	37.6%
Industrials	10.2%	0.2%
Utilities	9.8%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	4.6%
Healthcare	2.8%	0.0%
Technology	0.9%	-
Real Estate	0.4%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	0.2%	6.3%
Communication Services	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%

Return for Risk

HAP vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAP

HAP Risk / Return Rank: 89
HAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
HAP Omega Ratio Rank: 88
HAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
HAP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

GNR

GNR Risk / Return Rank: 82
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 76
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAP vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HAP	GNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.14	2.64	+0.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	3.38	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.46	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.65	5.43	+0.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.05	21.28	+1.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HAP vs. GNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAP Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is comparable to the GNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAP and GNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HAP	GNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.14	2.64	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63	0.48	+0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	0.50	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.26	0.00

Drawdowns

HAP vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAP drawdown since its inception was -50.73%, roughly equal to the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAP and GNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAP	GNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.73%	-51.37%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.31%	-7.97%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.92%	-21.15%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.66%	-25.66%	0.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.07%	-48.59%	+4.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.95%	-1.51%	-0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.03%	-14.95%	+2.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	2.03%	0.00%

Volatility

HAP vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) have volatilities of 4.37% and 4.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAP	GNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.37%	4.53%	-0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.24%	13.23%	-0.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.91%	16.39%	-1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.24%	20.23%	-1.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.74%	21.88%	-2.14%

HAP vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAP has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

HAP vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison

HAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than GNR's 2.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	2.47%	2.76%	4.73%	3.37%	4.37%	3.44%	2.78%	3.84%	3.51%	2.40%	2.06%	4.59%
HAP VanEck Natural Resources ETF	1.87%	2.27%	2.65%	3.27%	3.28%	2.16%	2.45%	2.80%	2.85%	2.02%	1.99%	3.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAP and GNR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, HAP and GNR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, HAP or GNR?

GNR has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to HAP (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAP dropped -50.73% vs GNR's -51.37%.

Which ETF is better, HAP or GNR?

On 10-year performance, HAP leads with 11.99% vs 10.91% for GNR. On fees, GNR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HAP has been the lower-risk option at 4.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, HAP or GNR?

Over the 10-year period, HAP has performed better with a 11.99% return vs 10.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, HAP or GNR?

GNR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for HAP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, HAP or GNR?

GNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.47%, compared with 1.87% for HAP.

What is the main difference between HAP and GNR?

HAP is categorized as Energy Equities, while GNR is Commodity Producers Equities. HAP tracks MarketVector Global Natural Resources Index, while GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for HAP and 0.40% for GNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.