HAFN vs. INSW
HAFN (Hafnia Limited) and INSW (International Seaways, Inc.) are both stocks. HAFN operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while INSW operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past year, HAFN returned 65.87% vs 127.10% for INSW. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
HAFN vs. INSW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HAFN achieves a 48.52% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 65.57% return.
HAFN
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -14.21%
- YTD
- 48.52%
- 6M
- 36.21%
- 1Y
- 65.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INSW
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -8.15%
- YTD
- 65.57%
- 6M
- 56.10%
- 1Y
- 127.10%
- 3Y*
- 42.07%
- 5Y*
- 44.87%
- 10Y*
- —
HAFN vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
HAFN Hafnia Limited | 48.52% | 2.71% | -12.52% |
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 65.57% | 44.97% | -23.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between HAFN and INSW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2024 | 0.69 |
The correlation between HAFN and INSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
HAFN:
$3.91B
INSW:
$3.88B
HAFN:
$0.90
INSW:
$11.01
HAFN:
8.54
INSW:
7.08
HAFN:
0.18
INSW:
1.12
HAFN:
1.62
INSW:
5.72
HAFN:
1.54
INSW:
1.77
HAFN:
$2.41B
INSW:
$675.87M
HAFN:
$496.74M
INSW:
$274.33M
HAFN:
$679.63M
INSW:
$525.75M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HAFN vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank
HAFN
INSW
HAFN vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hafnia Limited (HAFN) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HAFN | INSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.48 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 7.91 | -4.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 23.47 | -14.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HAFN | INSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 3.49 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.61 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
HAFN vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HAFN drawdown since its inception was -53.75%, smaller than the maximum INSW drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAFN and INSW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HAFN | INSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.75% | -57.49% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.13% | -16.16% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -50.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.29% | -14.90% | -3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.20% | -20.91% | -0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.59% | 5.44% | +2.15% |
Volatility
HAFN vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison
Hafnia Limited (HAFN) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) have volatilities of 11.74% and 11.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HAFN | INSW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.74% | 11.74% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.56% | 27.72% | -3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.77% | 36.61% | -1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.18% | 41.01% | -2.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.18% | 45.21% | -7.03% |
Dividends
HAFN vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison
HAFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than INSW's 5.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HAFN Hafnia Limited | 5.75% | 7.48% | 20.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
INSW International Seaways, Inc. | 5.62% | 6.04% | 16.05% | 13.83% | 3.84% | 9.26% | 1.47% |
Financials
HAFN vs. INSW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hafnia Limited and International Seaways, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
HAFN and INSW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INSW has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to HAFN (11.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAFN dropped -53.75% vs INSW's -57.49%.
INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HAFN and INSW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer