PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAFN vs. INSW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HAFN vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hafnia Limited (HAFN) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAFN achieves a 48.52% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 65.57% return.


HAFN

1D
-0.77%
1M
-14.21%
YTD
48.52%
6M
36.21%
1Y
65.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

INSW

1D
-0.71%
1M
-8.15%
YTD
65.57%
6M
56.10%
1Y
127.10%
3Y*
42.07%
5Y*
44.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAFN vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
48.52%2.71%-12.52%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
65.57%44.97%-23.02%

Correlation

The correlation between HAFN and INSW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2024

0.69

The correlation between HAFN and INSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HAFN:

$3.91B

INSW:

$3.88B

EPS

HAFN:

$0.90

INSW:

$11.01

PE Ratio

HAFN:

8.54

INSW:

7.08

PEG Ratio

HAFN:

0.18

INSW:

1.12

PS Ratio

HAFN:

1.62

INSW:

5.72

PB Ratio

HAFN:

1.54

INSW:

1.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

HAFN:

$2.41B

INSW:

$675.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HAFN:

$496.74M

INSW:

$274.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

HAFN:

$679.63M

INSW:

$525.75M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAFN vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAFN
HAFN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HAFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAFN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HAFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAFN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

INSW
INSW Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAFN vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hafnia Limited (HAFN) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAFNINSWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

7.91

-4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.70

23.47

-14.77

HAFN vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is lower than the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 3.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAFN and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAFNINSWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

3.49

-1.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.61

-0.23

Drawdowns

HAFN vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAFN drawdown since its inception was -53.75%, smaller than the maximum INSW drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAFN and INSW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAFNINSWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.75%

-57.49%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.13%

-16.16%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.29%

-14.90%

-3.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.20%

-20.91%

-0.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.59%

5.44%

+2.15%

Volatility

HAFN vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

Hafnia Limited (HAFN) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) have volatilities of 11.74% and 11.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAFNINSWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.74%

11.74%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.56%

27.72%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.77%

36.61%

-1.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.18%

41.01%

-2.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.18%

45.21%

-7.03%

Dividends

HAFN vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

HAFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than INSW's 5.62% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
5.75%7.48%20.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
INSW
International Seaways, Inc.
5.62%6.04%16.05%13.83%3.84%9.26%1.47%

Financials

HAFN vs. INSW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hafnia Limited and International Seaways, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
671.22M
15.96M
(HAFN) Total Revenue
(INSW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


HAFN and INSW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INSW has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to HAFN (11.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAFN dropped -53.75% vs INSW's -57.49%.

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAFN and INSW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer