HAFN vs. INSW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

HAFN (Hafnia Limited) and INSW (International Seaways, Inc.) are both stocks. HAFN operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials), while INSW operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy). Over the past year, HAFN returned 55.46% vs 159.64% for INSW. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

HAFN vs. INSW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hafnia Limited (HAFN) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAFN achieves a 52.02% return, which is significantly lower than INSW's 102.22% return.

HAFN

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: -7.35%
• YTD: 52.02%
• 6M: 52.31%
• 1Y: 55.46%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INSW

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: 14.02%
• YTD: 102.22%
• 6M: 105.09%
• 1Y: 159.64%
• 3Y*: 50.05%
• 5Y*: 49.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAFN vs. INSW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
HAFN Hafnia Limited	52.02%	2.71%	-14.02%
INSW International Seaways, Inc.	102.22%	44.97%	-25.25%

Correlation

The correlation between HAFN and INSW is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2024	0.69

The correlation between HAFN and INSW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap HAFN : $3.85B INSW : $4.47B
EPS HAFN : $0.90 INSW : $11.01
PE Ratio HAFN : 8.42 INSW : 8.18
PEG Ratio HAFN : 0.18 INSW : 1.29
PS Ratio HAFN : 1.60 INSW : 6.60
PB Ratio HAFN : 1.52 INSW : 2.04
Total Revenue (TTM) HAFN : $2.41B INSW : $675.87M
Gross Profit (TTM) HAFN : $496.74M INSW : $274.33M
EBITDA (TTM) HAFN : $679.63M INSW : $525.75M

Return for Risk

HAFN vs. INSW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAFN

HAFN Risk / Return Rank: 80
HAFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
HAFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
HAFN Omega Ratio Rank: 78
HAFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HAFN Martin Ratio Rank: 81

INSW

INSW Risk / Return Rank: 97
INSW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
INSW Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
INSW Omega Ratio Rank: 96
INSW Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
INSW Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAFN vs. INSW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hafnia Limited (HAFN) and International Seaways, Inc. (INSW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HAFN	INSW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	4.40	-2.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	4.98	-2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.58	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	9.94	-7.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.64	28.95	-22.31

HAFN vs. INSW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAFN Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the INSW Sharpe Ratio of 4.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAFN and INSW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HAFN vs. INSW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAFN drawdown since its inception was -53.75%, smaller than the maximum INSW drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAFN and INSW.

Drawdown Indicators

	HAFN	INSW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.75%	-57.49%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.63%	-16.16%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-50.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.36%	0.00%	-16.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.13%	-20.84%	-0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.46%	5.56%	+2.90%

Volatility

HAFN vs. INSW - Volatility Comparison

Hafnia Limited (HAFN) has a higher volatility of 11.99% compared to International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) at 10.84%. This indicates that HAFN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INSW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HAFN	INSW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.99%	10.84%	+1.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.97%	28.23%	-2.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.92%	36.64%	-1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.27%	41.12%	-2.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.27%	45.28%	-7.01%

Dividends

HAFN vs. INSW - Dividend Comparison

HAFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than INSW's 9.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HAFN Hafnia Limited	9.61%	7.48%	20.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
INSW International Seaways, Inc.	9.26%	6.04%	16.05%	13.83%	3.84%	9.26%	1.47%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HAFN and INSW in my portfolio?

HAFN and INSW have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HAFN or INSW?

HAFN has higher volatility (11.99%) compared to INSW (10.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAFN dropped -53.75% vs INSW's -57.49%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

INSW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.