HACBY vs. EAT
HACBY (Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. HACBY operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, HACBY returned 12.59%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for EAT. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HACBY vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HACBY achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's -2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, HACBY has underperformed EAT with an annualized return of 12.59%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return.
HACBY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 14.14%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 6M
- 24.17%
- 1Y
- 63.87%
- 3Y*
- 49.63%
- 5Y*
- 32.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
EAT
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 6M
- -1.27%
- 1Y
- -19.09%
- 3Y*
- 52.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.45%
HACBY vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACBY Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR | 24.17% | 91.80% | 13.70% | 32.97% | 24.57% | -3.28% | -22.69% | 7.06% | -29.46% | -0.06% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | -2.27% | 8.49% | 206.37% | 35.32% | -12.79% | -35.32% | 36.16% | -0.92% | 17.27% | -18.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between HACBY and EAT is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016 | 0.03 |
The correlation between HACBY and EAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
HACBY:
$6.23B
EAT:
$6.24B
HACBY:
$283.66
EAT:
$10.14
HACBY:
0.10
EAT:
13.83
HACBY:
0.00
EAT:
0.32
HACBY:
0.02
EAT:
1.12
HACBY:
0.01
EAT:
15.37
HACBY:
$299.73B
EAT:
$5.73B
HACBY:
$244.80B
EAT:
$3.45B
HACBY:
$80.85B
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HACBY vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
HACBY
EAT
HACBY vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR (HACBY) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HACBY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 0.96 | +0.70 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.17 | -0.43 | +3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.93 | -0.89 | +10.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HACBY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | -0.41 | +1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.41 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.25 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.07 | 0.28 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
HACBY vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HACBY drawdown since its inception was -83.62%, smaller than the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HACBY and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HACBY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.62% | -88.40% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.26% | -44.41% | +24.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -83.49% | -45.92% | -37.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.49% | -65.73% | -17.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.62% | -84.94% | +1.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -25.84% | +25.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.75% | -24.34% | -7.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.45% | 21.52% | -15.07% |
Volatility
HACBY vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR (HACBY) is 13.22%, while Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a volatility of 16.02%. This indicates that HACBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HACBY | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.22% | 16.02% | -2.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.05% | 35.41% | -16.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.95% | 46.21% | +18.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 190.41% | 49.06% | +141.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 137.99% | 55.07% | +82.92% |
Dividends
HACBY vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
HACBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
HACBY Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR | 0.94% | 2.95% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 2.44% | 0.00% |
Financials
HACBY vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HACBY vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
HACBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 83.20B and revenue of 97.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
HACBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 12.70B and revenue of 97.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
HACBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR reported a net income of 17.17B and revenue of 97.90B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HACBY and EAT have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EAT has higher volatility (16.02%) compared to HACBY (13.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HACBY dropped -83.62% vs EAT's -88.40%.
HACBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HACBY and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer