PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

H4ZX.DE is traded in EUR, while CXSE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CXSE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZX.DE achieves a -10.21% return, which is significantly lower than CXSE's 1.71% return.


H4ZX.DE

1D
-0.76%
1M
1.65%
YTD
-10.21%
6M
-11.15%
1Y
-6.78%
3Y*
6.77%
5Y*
-8.49%
10Y*

CXSE

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.17%
YTD
1.71%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
19.04%
3Y*
8.18%
5Y*
-7.28%
10Y*
6.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
H4ZX.DE
HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD
-10.21%10.69%28.06%-11.53%-20.44%-29.60%2.10%
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.71%20.74%15.73%-20.48%-24.94%-17.96%4.81%

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZX.DE and CXSE is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2020

0.82

The correlation between H4ZX.DE and CXSE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZX.DE
H4ZX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

CXSE
CXSE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
CXSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXSE Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
CXSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXSE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) and WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZX.DECXSEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.17

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

1.17

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.41

2.34

-2.75

H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the CXSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZX.DE and CXSE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZX.DECXSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

0.92

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.22

-0.24

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.20

0.22

-0.43

Drawdowns

H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZX.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, roughly equal to the maximum CXSE drawdown of -66.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZX.DE and CXSE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZX.DECXSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.32%

-66.54%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.08%

-16.33%

-13.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.31%

-30.82%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.34%

-60.83%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.22%

-44.24%

-7.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.50%

-25.54%

-23.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.57%

8.16%

+8.41%

Volatility

H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund (CXSE) at 6.81%. This indicates that H4ZX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CXSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


H4ZX.DECXSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.02%

6.81%

+3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.64%

13.90%

+4.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.17%

20.91%

+5.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.84%

30.91%

+6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.65%

28.08%

+9.57%

H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZX.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CXSE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

H4ZX.DE vs. CXSE - Dividend Comparison

H4ZX.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CXSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
1.99%1.95%1.70%1.71%1.55%0.86%0.54%0.96%1.49%1.24%1.39%2.50%
H4ZX.DE
HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


H4ZX.DE and CXSE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CXSE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CXSE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for H4ZX.DE.

H4ZX.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while CXSE is China Equities. H4ZX.DE tracks Hang Seng TECH, while CXSE tracks WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for H4ZX.DE and 0.32% for CXSE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for H4ZX.DE and CXSE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer