PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) and iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
H4ZX.DE
HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD
-13.96%10.69%28.06%-11.53%-4.35%
CBUK.DE
iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc
-9.89%21.05%18.05%-9.04%-1.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZX.DE achieves a -13.96% return, which is significantly lower than CBUK.DE's -9.89% return.


H4ZX.DE

1D
0.88%
1M
-3.54%
YTD
-13.96%
6M
-25.69%
1Y
-18.02%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
-10.78%
10Y*

CBUK.DE

1D
1.46%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
-9.89%
6M
-20.31%
1Y
-3.02%
3Y*
4.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZX.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUK.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZX.DE
H4ZX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUK.DE
CBUK.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUK.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) and iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZX.DECBUK.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

-0.11

-0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.75

0.02

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.00

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

-0.07

-0.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.30

-0.17

-1.14

H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZX.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the CBUK.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZX.DE and CBUK.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZX.DECBUK.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

-0.11

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.11

-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZX.DE and CBUK.DE is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither H4ZX.DE nor CBUK.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZX.DE drawdown since its inception was -69.32%, which is greater than CBUK.DE's maximum drawdown of -37.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZX.DE and CBUK.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZX.DECBUK.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.32%

-37.29%

-32.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.90%

-23.30%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-62.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.21%

-22.17%

-32.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.39%

-16.28%

-33.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.07%

10.16%

+2.91%

Volatility

H4ZX.DE vs. CBUK.DE - Volatility Comparison

HSBC Hang Seng TECH UCITS ETF HKD (H4ZX.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to iShares MSCI China Tech UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUK.DE) at 7.53%. This indicates that H4ZX.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUK.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


H4ZX.DECBUK.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

7.53%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.35%

16.49%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.59%

26.22%

+2.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.64%

31.67%

+5.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.86%

31.67%

+6.19%