H4ZA.DE vs. XB4A.DE
H4ZA.DE (HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - H4ZA.DE tracks the EURO STOXX® 50 while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, H4ZA.DE returned 11.03%/yr vs 14.60%/yr for XB4A.DE. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. H4ZA.DE charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XB4A.DE.
Performance
H4ZA.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, H4ZA.DE achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 22.80% return. Over the past 10 years, H4ZA.DE has underperformed XB4A.DE with an annualized return of 11.03%, while XB4A.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 14.60% annualized return.
H4ZA.DE
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 18.89%
- 3Y*
- 15.78%
- 5Y*
- 12.34%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 1Y
- 45.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
H4ZA.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 9.79% | 22.26% | 11.06% | 22.59% | -8.87% | 23.72% | -2.73% | 30.04% | -11.95% | 10.07% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.80% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 32.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between H4ZA.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2011 | 0.72 |
The correlation between H4ZA.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
H4ZA.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
H4ZA.DE
XB4A.DE
H4ZA.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| H4ZA.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.43 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 4.13 | -2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.00 | 13.97 | -7.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
H4ZA.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.40%, smaller than the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZA.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| H4ZA.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.40% | -53.54% | +15.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.97% | -10.88% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.39% | -16.26% | -0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.26% | -32.50% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.40% | -53.54% | +15.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -3.43% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -9.88% | +2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 3.23% | -0.09% |
Volatility
H4ZA.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) is 3.98%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that H4ZA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| H4ZA.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.98% | 4.97% | -0.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.35% | 14.95% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 17.66% | -1.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 19.15% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.81% | 20.15% | -2.34% |
H4ZA.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
H4ZA.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than XB4A.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
H4ZA.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, while XB4A.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H4ZA.DE HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR | 2.38% | 2.49% | 2.89% | 2.93% | 2.94% | 1.94% | 2.06% | 2.84% | 3.55% | 2.73% | 2.85% | 2.70% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
H4ZA.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: HSBC and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for H4ZA.DE and 0.25% for XB4A.DE.
Find the right allocation for H4ZA.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer