PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
-1.46%22.26%13.81%22.59%-8.87%23.72%-2.73%24.07%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
10.04%24.05%15.99%11.37%16.17%27.37%-10.74%15.55%
Different Trading Currencies

H4ZA.DE is traded in EUR, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, H4ZA.DE achieves a -1.46% return, which is significantly lower than TDGB.L's 9.42% return.


H4ZA.DE

1D
-0.65%
1M
-1.09%
YTD
-1.46%
6M
1.39%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
13.87%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
10.28%

TDGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.87%
YTD
9.42%
6M
17.89%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
20.31%
5Y*
17.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

H4ZA.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


H4ZA.DETDGB.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

1.87

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

2.28

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.40

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

5.80

-4.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.88

20.80

-15.92

H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of H4ZA.DE and TDGB.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


H4ZA.DETDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

1.87

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.49

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.95

-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between H4ZA.DE and TDGB.L is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, less than TDGB.L's 3.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.65%2.49%5.35%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.25%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum H4ZA.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.41%, which is greater than TDGB.L's maximum drawdown of -35.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for H4ZA.DE and TDGB.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


H4ZA.DETDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.41%

-29.60%

-8.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.97%

-9.11%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.26%

-12.41%

-10.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.65%

-0.56%

-7.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.90%

-3.75%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

1.34%

+1.64%

Volatility

H4ZA.DE vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.32% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 3.25%. This indicates that H4ZA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


H4ZA.DETDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.32%

3.25%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.00%

6.67%

+4.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.39%

12.82%

+4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.23%

12.04%

+5.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

15.53%

+2.58%