PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPS vs. TRUO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPS vs. TRUO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF (TRUO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


GXPS

1D
2.86%
1M
-0.21%
6M
5.56%
YTD
11.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRUO

1D
2.89%
1M
-0.22%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPS vs. TRUO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPS and TRUO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2026

0.93

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPS vs. TRUO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and VanEck Consumer Staples TruSector ETF (TRUO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPS vs. TRUO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPS vs. TRUO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, which is greater than TRUO's maximum drawdown of -3.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and TRUO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPSTRUODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.20%

-3.45%

-5.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.18%

-0.25%

-3.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-1.46%

-2.62%

Volatility

GXPS vs. TRUO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPSTRUODifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.71%

19.73%

-5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.71%

19.73%

-5.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.71%

19.73%

-5.02%

GXPS vs. TRUO - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUO's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

GXPS vs. TRUO - Dividend Comparison

GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while TRUO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, GXPS and TRUO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TRUO is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUO is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GXPS.

GXPS has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.00% for TRUO.

They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.14% for TRUO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPS and TRUO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer