GXPS vs. IXN
GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) and IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPS is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while IXN is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.32, they often move in opposite directions. GXPS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IXN.
Performance
GXPS vs. IXN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPS achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly lower than IXN's 33.92% return.
GXPS
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 8.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXN
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- YTD
- 33.92%
- 6M
- 32.85%
- 1Y
- 56.32%
- 3Y*
- 33.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- 25.68%
GXPS vs. IXN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 9.20% | -1.72% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 33.92% | 12.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPS and IXN is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | -0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPS vs. IXN — Risk / Return Rank
GXPS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXN
GXPS vs. IXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS) and iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPS | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.10 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.10 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPS vs. IXN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPS drawdown since its inception was -9.20%, smaller than the maximum IXN drawdown of -55.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPS and IXN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPS | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.20% | -55.67% | +46.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -36.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -6.09% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.97% | -11.25% | +7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.31% | — |
Volatility
GXPS vs. IXN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPS | IXN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.71% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.26% | 25.14% | -10.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 25.45% | -11.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.26% | 24.66% | -10.40% |
GXPS vs. IXN - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IXN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPS vs. IXN - Dividend Comparison
GXPS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than IXN's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.54% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.78% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPS and IXN have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXN.
IXN has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.54% for GXPS.
GXPS is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IXN is Technology Equities. GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index, while IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for GXPS and 0.46% for IXN.
Find the right allocation for GXPS and IXN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer