PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GXPE vs. POW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GXPE vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GXPE achieves a 28.48% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 35.68% return.


GXPE

1D
1.03%
1M
4.22%
6M
20.71%
YTD
28.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

POW

1D
-3.68%
1M
-13.79%
6M
25.01%
YTD
35.68%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GXPE vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GXPE and POW is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

-0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GXPE vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GXPE vs. POW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GXPE vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GXPE drawdown since its inception was -15.73%, smaller than the maximum POW drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPE and POW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GXPEPOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.73%

-20.28%

+4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.79%

-20.28%

+11.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-4.56%

+0.35%

Volatility

GXPE vs. POW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GXPEPOWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.77%

33.06%

-12.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.77%

33.06%

-12.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.77%

33.06%

-12.29%

GXPE vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GXPE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

GXPE vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

GXPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than POW's 0.14% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GXPE and POW have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

GXPE has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.14% for POW.

GXPE is categorized as Energy Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPE and 0.75% for POW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GXPE and POW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer