GXPD vs. QYLD
GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPD is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Both are passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
GXPD vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPD achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.13%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 7.88%
- 6M
- 9.97%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 13.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.80%
GXPD vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -0.87% | 5.44% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 7.88% | 11.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPD and QYLD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPD vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
GXPD
QYLD
GXPD vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GXPD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.59 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
GXPD vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPD drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPD and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -24.75% | +8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.48% | -0.06% | -5.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -3.84% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
GXPD vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPD | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 8.58% | +11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 14.70% | +5.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.01% | 15.49% | +4.52% |
GXPD vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPD vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
GXPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than QYLD's 11.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.19% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.46% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPD and QYLD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.46%, compared with 0.19% for GXPD.
GXPD is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index, while QYLD tracks CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPD and 0.60% for QYLD.
Find the right allocation for GXPD and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer