GXPD vs. ISHP
GXPD (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF) and ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - GXPD tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index while ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISHP.
Performance
GXPD vs. ISHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPD achieves a -4.42% return, which is significantly higher than ISHP's -16.46% return.
GXPD
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -6.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISHP
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- -3.26%
- YTD
- -16.46%
- 6M
- -16.45%
- 1Y
- -14.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.69%
- 5Y*
- 0.46%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPD vs. ISHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | -4.42% | 5.36% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | -16.46% | -3.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPD and ISHP is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPD vs. ISHP — Risk / Return Rank
GXPD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISHP
GXPD vs. ISHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) and First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPD | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.88 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.58 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPD vs. ISHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPD drawdown since its inception was -16.61%, smaller than the maximum ISHP drawdown of -47.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPD and ISHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPD | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.61% | -47.57% | +30.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.86% | -23.26% | +14.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.40% | -12.69% | +8.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.40% | — |
Volatility
GXPD vs. ISHP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPD | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.38% | 17.62% | +2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 27.26% | -6.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 24.08% | -3.70% |
GXPD vs. ISHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ISHP's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPD vs. ISHP - Dividend Comparison
GXPD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than ISHP's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPD Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.60% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPD and ISHP have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
ISHP has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.20% for GXPD.
GXPD tracks MSCI USA Consumer Discretionary PureCap Index, while ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPD and 0.60% for ISHP.
Find the right allocation for GXPD and ISHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer