GXPC vs. BOTZ
GXPC (Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GXPC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index, while BOTZ is a Robotics fund tracking the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GXPC charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
GXPC vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GXPC achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's -1.88% return.
GXPC
- 1D
- -3.24%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BOTZ
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -7.28%
- YTD
- -1.88%
- 1Y
- 9.65%
- 3Y*
- 6.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.52%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPC vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 3.57% | 19.31% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | -1.88% | 10.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between GXPC and BOTZ is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GXPC vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
GXPC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BOTZ
GXPC vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GXPC | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.08 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.50 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GXPC vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GXPC drawdown since its inception was -16.59%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GXPC and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GXPC | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.59% | -55.54% | +38.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.34% | -14.61% | +7.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -18.22% | +14.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.72% | — |
Volatility
GXPC vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GXPC | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.03% | 26.28% | -5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 27.20% | -6.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 25.87% | -4.84% |
GXPC vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GXPC has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
GXPC vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
GXPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than BOTZ's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.50% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
GXPC Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF | 0.31% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GXPC and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPC is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPC is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
BOTZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.31% for GXPC.
GXPC is categorized as Communications Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. GXPC tracks MSCI USA Communication Services PureCap Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for GXPC and 0.68% for BOTZ.
Find the right allocation for GXPC and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer